04-25-2005 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

m.\ i «K)5-5080 ApHI 18,2005 Page 3 of7 Exhibit P - Sheet C8-1, Detail Sheet Exhibit Q - Sheet C8-2, Detail Sheet Exhibit R - Sheet Ll-I, Landscape Plan Exhibit S - Sheet L2*l, Lighting Plan Exhibit T - Sheet A-l, Lower Level Floor Plan Exhibit U - Sheet A>2, Main Level Floor Plan Exhibit V - Sheet A -3, Upper Level Floor Plan Exhibit W - Sheet A-4, Front Elevation Exhibit X - Sheet A*S, Walk-Out Elevation Exhibit Y - Sheet A-6, Side Elevation (1) Exhibit Z - Sheet A-7, Side Elevation (2) Exhibit AA - Proposed Sign Exhibit BB - Orem Space Illustration Exhibit CC - Homeowners Association Documents Exhibit DD - PC Report dated 1-14-OS General Developiiimt Plan Review This stage of the review is much like the final plat review stage, which ordinarily is not reviewed by the Planning Conunission. Rather than go through all the requirements of the B - 6 zoning district, wdiich was done in the attached concept plan PC report, the focus will be on fulfilling the requirements of the Concept Plan approval Resolution. The issues discussed below are a focus of the outstanding issues listed in the concept plan approval resolution. Architecture The City Council required that the iq)plicant incorporate a more traditional style of architecture, including features such as a pitched roof. The applicant presented the City Council with a fiont and walk-out elevation showing incorporation of a pitched roof and mme traditional fiont entry. The City Council accepted that design change but stipulated that at the General Development Plan review stage, the fiont elevation view should be further refined to incorporate some type of feature in the roof, possibly a dormer. The applicants have submitted new elevation views, attached as Exhibit V-Y, which appear to meet this requirement. However, in revising the architectural styles the site plan has changed somewhat from when the Plaiming Conunission originally reviewed this application. The changes consist of duplex style buildings with shared entrances in the center. The number of units, lots proposed, square footages, parking and proposed grading remain virtually unchanged however the number of clusters is now five rather than the previous three. The finished floor elevations and basement floor elevations are comparable to those shown on the three cluster plan thus not changing the appearance of the buildings from neighboring sites. The revised site plan meets all setl^k and lot standards of the B - 6 Zoning District