04-25-2005 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

i^plicant agreed at the meeting to this. Staff Recommeiidatioa Staff recommends iqiproval of the General Development Plan with the following stipulations: 1. Plans illustrating dedication of a public driveway easement connecting from the southeasterly access to the site, to the northwest boundary of the site, should be submitted prior to final approval by the City Council. The driveway easement must follow the proposed drive aisle of the parking lot, be a minimum width of 24* and must be submitted as a separate document for filing, as it cannot be shown on the plat. 2. At the time the City’s landscape consultant submits comments regarding the proposed landscaping, those comments shall be incorporated into the proposed landscape plan. (Comments have been received alon'> with additional minor engineering matters, attached as Exhibit C. These items should be incorporated into the final plans.) 3. City Engineer approval of the Hinting plan and clarification of the method of lighting the proposed sign. 4. A revised monument sign plan shall be submitted meeting the base requirement and not exceeding 100 square feet prior to final approval. At the time a revised monument style sign is submitted meeting the monument standards, the applicant should also submit a plan illustrating the sizes and content of any signs to be affixed to the buildings, if any are proposed. 5. A revised set of elevations should be submitted illustrating like building materials for all ftcades to match the building materials noted on the front elevation. 6. Revised association documents must be submitted meeting the requirement noted on page 7, #16 of the concept plan approval resolution regarding formation of a review/approval committee to help regulate intensities of uses. Following comments received from the neighbor ’s of the Sugarwoods development, staff would oiTer the following questions to the Council to help fittilitate concerns regarding trees and potential loss: 1. Can trees be incorporated into the northeastern comer of the site? 2. Can the retaining wall systems along the northerly lot line be shifted 5 ’ south to give an additional S’ of protection to the root systems of the trees existing on the Sugarwoods residentia] neighborhoods outlot? COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED The Council may act on this application under one or both of the following scenarios: 1. Direct the applicant to revise the development plan giving some direction as to what may be acceptable. This may occur through a tabling if Council so chooses to allow for redesign. I, or 2. Direct staff to draft 1) a resolution approving the Genoal Development Plan implementing the infixmation noted within the above staff recommendation, and any additional stipulations deemed necessary; 2) a resolution for plat approval; and 3) a PUD Development Agreement fix review and adoption at the Council ’s May 9"* or 23"* meeting. X2liu.£ij: ----