Laserfiche WebLink
( <br />V <br />Dale Application Received: 12-22-04 <br />Date Applicalloa Considered as Complete: 01-06-05 <br />60-Day Review Period Expiration • Extension: 05-06-05 <br />COMM/'ii MrPTlMn <br />MAH 2 8 2005 <br />Cl IY Or <br />REQUEST FOR COUNaL ACTION <br />Date: March 22,2005 <br />Item No. V <br />Department Approval: a <br />Name: Melanie Curtis Hy <br />Title: City Planner ' <br />Administrator Approval:Agenda Section: <br />Item Description: <br />#05-3074 - Sean & Melissa Wambold - 1379 Park Drive - After-the-Fact CUP & Variances <br />Zoning District: <br />Lot Area: <br />LR-IB, One Family Lakeshore Residential, 1-acrc <br />1.3 acre (56,845 s.f.) <br />List of Exhibits: <br />A. Revised Plans & Plan Reviewed by PC on 02-22-05 <br />B. PC Memos & Exhibits of 01-06-05 & 02-15-05 <br />C. 60-Day Review Extension <br />D. City Engineer Letter Review of Revised Plan <br />E. PC Action Notices <br />F. PC Minutes from January and February <br />Application Summary: <br />'ITie applicants recently purchased the property at 1379 Park Drive. After purcha.sing the property they <br />were notified that the retaining walls and hardcover in the lakeshore yard was installed by the previous <br />owner without proper City permits. As their intent is to do remodeling including a small addition in <br />the future the applicants would like to bring the property into compliance. <br />This application was tabled at the January Planning Commission meeting in order to provide the <br />applicants time to work with a landscape professional to redesign and remove hardcover. For the <br />February meeting the applicants provided a revised proposal with removals resulting in 25% hardcover <br />within the 75’-250’ setback zone and 268 s.f of hardcover within the 0-75’ zone. <br />Although, the applicants have provided yet another .set of revised plans meeting Staff and the Pfenning <br />Commi.ssion’s direction at the February meeting, they would still like the Council to consider their <br />request for a hardcover variance to allow 268 s.f of hardcover within the 0-75’ zone. They feel that <br />by allowing the current retaining wall, existing vegetation and path to the lake to remain within this <br />zone there would be less impact on the lake and would allow for uninterrupted use of their lake yard. <br />The applicants arc currently working on a plan for a remodel of the residence for this fall and have <br />agreed to remove any excess hardcover within the 75’ - 250’ zone a.s a part of this cur'ent application. <br />Planning Commission Rccommendition