Laserfiche WebLink
MINIITKS OK Till: <br />ORONO CITY COUNC IL MF.ETINO <br />Monday, December 13, 2004 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />(to. M04-3060 MICHAEL A DONNA EBERTZ, 1220 TONKAH'A ROAD, Continued) <br />GafTron staled he would prefer to bring this application back before the Council at their next meeting after <br />he has time to review the history of this property. <br />libert/ questioned whether he would be better off removing the boulder wall than having to deal with all <br />the outstanding issues Ich by the previous owner. <br />Peterson noted these issues would need to be dealt with in the future if the applicant should decide to <br />build onto his house. <br />Murphy inquired whether the applicant is agreeable to tabling the application. <br />Lbertz stated he is. <br />Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to table Application 1104-3060, Michael and Donna <br />Kbertz, 1220 Tonkawa Road. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />('urtis inquired whether the applicants have implemented what the City Engineer has recommended to <br />prepare the site for the winter and spring. <br />Mrs. KIk’iI/, slated they have. <br />*11. #04-3066 WILLIAM & ANITA ROUSE, 4051 lll<iilW(M)D ROAD - VARIANC'ES - <br />RKSOl.UTION NO. 5270 <br />Murphy moved. While seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5270, a Resolution Granting Side <br />Setback Variances and a Lake Setback Variance for Bill and Anita Rouse, 4051 lligbwood Road. <br />VOTE; Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />12. W04-.3067 I.ECY CON.STRUCTION ON BEHALF OF DENNIS AND AMANDA WAI-SII, <br />1354 RE.S I POINT LANE - VARIANCES - RFISOLUTION NO. 525V <br />Amanda and Dennis Walsh, Applicants, were present <br />(iaffron staled at the last C'ouncil meeting action was taken to approve the requested variances and allow <br />the entire gravel parking/snow storage area to remain. After tlie applicant had left the building, the <br />Council voted 5-0 to reconsider, and directed Stall li» attempt to obtain an easeiiK'nt for the snow storage <br />area from the applicant. Since the meeting StalThas asked the applicant if he would be willing to grant an <br />easement, with the applicant indicating that he is opposed to the easeoKnl. <br />< iai lron indicated a number of agreements w ere proposed, w itli one agreement granting the City the right <br />to tcmporanly use the properly for the |>urpo.scs of snow storage for a jKiiod of ten years. Ciaffron stated <br />under this agi cement the ('ity would agree to pave the area to minimi/e the amount of crushed riKk that is <br />currently de|>osited from the snow storage area onto the owner’s l.iwn, I Ins agreement would be binding <br />upon liiture owners of the property but would expire after ten years (iailron indicated it is Staffs <br />understanding the applicants arc agreeable to entering into this agreement but in Staffs |xrrs|Kctive the <br />agreement is Hawed in a numtier of w ays. <br />PAGE IS