My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-28-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
03-28-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2023 4:07:34 PM
Creation date
1/11/2023 3:39:51 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
362
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
o <br />A'MINUTES OF THE <br />OKONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, March 21,2005 <br />6:00 o’clock p.ni. <br />Dctli Krcsiic, 3455 Sliorcline Drive, stated the parking at this site is a big concern ofticis and that the <br />pill king should be better defined. Krcsiic inquired whcliicr llic agrccincnl covers the upper parking lot <br />or the lower parking lot. Krcsiic noted the landlord is aware of the parking situation. <br />Gundlach slated the existing three businesses and the five apartments require 30.5 stalls, with the upper <br />and lower lots providing 28 stalls. Gundlach noted this docs not include the parking rcquiiemenls for <br />Jul Ann’s. Gundlach staled all the parking spaces for Jul Ann’s, plus 2.5 additional spaces, would need <br />to be provided on Keaveny’s lot, for a total of 8.5 stalls. <br />(Iiair Rahn closed the public hearing. <br />Rahn stated in his view adding another tenant in this building is over-leasing this building and that the <br />lower units were probably originally constructed to accommodate storage. Rahn noted the City does not <br />have any record of tenants being in the lower level even tliough there liavc been tenants located in theic <br />in the past. Rahn commented the shared parking agiccnient might be a dangerous precedent in this <br />situation. <br />Harry Kreslins inquired what the objection would be if they meet all the lequirements of the City. <br />Rahn slated typieally people are required to meet the eodc on that subject property. Rahn commented <br />this is similar to people boirowing hardcover from another pro|K*ily and applying it against this <br />pio|iei ty. Rahn reiterated his eonccni that this properly is being over-leased by adding another tenant <br />and IS compounding the parking concerns. <br />Over.son noted the ncighboi iiig lot is not cunenlly being ulih/ed and that there is plenty of parking <br />space available. <br />Gundlach stated if the howling alley reopens, the parking would not l»e sufficieul on that site and the <br />parking agieenient with Jul Ann’s would probably be terminated. <br />Winkey inquired ho» -..any employees Jul Ann’s employs. <br />1 ‘AGE 3 <br />4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.