Laserfiche WebLink
L <br />MIMJTFS OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL IVILi: I IN<i <br />Manday, March S4,2005 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(#05-3078 Cary and Lynn Christensen, ( ontinned) <br />Clu^istcnscn stated he would like to start construction on the garage once the house is completed and that <br />he is hopeful the project ctnild be completed by the end of the summer. <br />Sanscverc suggested putting a deadline for when the shed has to be removed. <br />Curtis noted a variance would be required to raise the pitch of the roof. <br />Christensen commented his neighbor is fine with raising tbe pitch of the roof on the garage. <br />McMillan tnqutrcd how Staff would enforce the removal of the shed in the future. <br />Gaffron stated one option would be to require removal of the shed prior to final inspection <br />Muqrhy inquired whether the applicant is in agreement to remove the hed in the future <br />Christensen indicated he is w illing to remove the shed. Clmstenscn noted he also is in agreement w ith <br />removal of the other Hems mentioned by staff <br />Murphy moved, .McMillan seconded, to direct Staff to draft an approval resolution for <br />Application #05-3078,3560 Ivy Place, subject to conditions one and two outlined in the <br />March 8, 2005 Planner’s Report, and further subject to the understanding that the shed may be <br />used for temporary storage through construction but must be removed by the applicants’ move in <br />dateor December 1,2005. V01E: Ayes4, NavsO. <br />8. #05-3080 INI ERSPACE WEST, 2060 WAYZATA ROI LF.\’ARD WT.S I - PUD - <br />CONC EPT PLAN REVIEW' <br />Gina and Philip Carlson. Interspace West, and Daniel Kaplan. Allomey-al-I aw. were present. <br />Gundlaeh slated at the last City Council meeting the applicants were directed to redesign the archiieelurc <br />for Uic proposed townhouse/offiee units. ITit applicants have submitted a revised elevation view in an <br />attempt to ineorimrale what was discussed at the last meeting Gundlaeh indicated a pitched uxif w ith a <br />more traditional eniryway has been incorporated into the design, with the new units having access through <br />a shared entrance in the center of the building rather than on the end of the unit, llie applicants are still <br />proposing the buildings to be constructed in clusters and contain the same amoiinl of square footage as the <br />previous propo.sal. <br />(itiiuilach noted the changes do not affect the parking layout, the finished fl»M»r elevations ol the units, or <br />remaining wall heights and elevations. <br />.Stall IS requesting the Council determine if the architectural revisions are adequate, and if the revisions <br />meet ( ouncil s c.\|K‘ctalions. to direct siall to draft a resolution approving the concept plan for a|)pi«ival at <br />the next meeting. <br />pa(;e 9