03-28-2005 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINI?TI SOI< Till: ORONOn i V ( (HiNriL MKKTINC; Mohiliiy, Marcli 14, 2005 7:00 crclock p.iii. (W05-3O7K CJary and Lynn ('ontlnucd) TIu* Planning roininission fiiflliri rcrnininnuird lhal (he nrw dnrincf s nu'cM llir llMoot snic sribnck. Ilir applieants air also piuposing to tcinnvr the shrd (roin the ad|arrnt lot and plarc it on the slab next to the garage 1 he apphrants would rrdiirr the si/r ol the slab next to the gaiagr to arronunodatc the shnl with 0 Hinall apron ( urtis noted the uppheunts in the lutnie would like to leplace the existing lotiron the garage to inateh the iHiiise. and at lhal time would lx* w illing to remove the shed and lemaming slab I he appheants aie also hiither |iioposmg to lernove the plav stini line horn the adjaeent lot and leUxate it in the garden neai the lioni dcMii ol the lesidenee In addition, they are pioposing to remove Uie excess Sidewalk. .Staff feels that the excess slnieturc of the shed and the hardcover associated w ilh it is not justitied by a liardship. Since there is not an appropriate or confonnnig site Ibi the sheil to lx* leloealeil. Staff wouM not be supportive td this re(|iiest C'urtis stated the diiveway is also an issut for the applicants I he ailiacent neighlHU ulih/es a poilion of the appheants* diiveway when he has guests Hie driveway existed piioi to the applicants owning the piopeity. with the applicants teehng that the neighboi would drive thioiigh then yard and park on their lawn riic applicants are rei|uesting that the diiveway remain to accommodate the neighbor. Stall rceogni/es the unique r’tuation at the street side ol the applicants* piopeity. as it is iiseil by the public aiul the neighboimg pio|ieity mvnei. and theieloie StalT woiiM support the diiveway paiknig area as it exists Sansevere inquired whetlier the a|iplicant is m agieement with Staff on the sheil ( luistensrn stated storoge is an issue lor them at the present time and that it wouKl !»e nice to be able to keep the .shed during construction on tlie house ('hiistensen noted he wouM be w ilhng to lemove the shed and the slab once the residence is completeil Mutphy inquired whcthci the applicants ate consnleiing changing the liNitpiint on the gaiage in the flit me. (liristensen stated they arc not. i *urtis stated the existing garage is located between two and a half to tluee Icet lioni the piopeity line .md It the pitch of the liHil is incieused. it would lequiie a vaiiance (’liMstrnsrn st.iicd he could reduce the slab to eight by ten. Mniphy nole«l the shed woiiltl be close to the pn*pe?ty line. (iallion iHMiifed out the shed wouKI also Ik* Kh ated veiv elosr to the lia\eled portion of tjic rondway rhlistellscri stated the shcil wouKI be tempoiai v while constiuclion mi the house is gmng on [Muridiy inquired when construeliun on the garage is cx|H:ctcd to commeikc