Laserfiche WebLink
February 22,2005 <br />Page 1 uf 6 <br />Date Application Received: 1-19-05 <br />Date Application Considered as Complete: 2-14-05 <br />60-Day Review Period Kipires: 4-14-05 <br />To:Cliair Ralin ami Planning Commission Members <br />Ron Moorsc, City Administrator <br />From: <br />Date: <br />Subject: <br />Janice Gundlach, City Planner ^ <br />1‘cbruary 17,2005 <br />05-3087, Scott Schneider on behalf of’Andrew and Marcia i-rcese, 2914 <br />Casco Point Road, Hardcover Variance, Average I,akesliore Setback <br />Variance, Public I learing <br />Zoning District: <br />l<nt Area: <br />l.ot Witith: <br />I.R - 1C, 0::e I’amily Lakeshore Residential District ('A acre ruin.) <br />0.60 acres (26,162 s.f.) <br />235’ (a) shoreline; 95’ (a) 75’ setback <br />Application Summary: Applicant requests the following variances in order to construct a <br />half story above the existing 2 story home in conjunction with other remodeling; <br />1. Hardcover variance to permit 29% hardcover within the 75’-250’ /.one when 31% <br />currently exists and 25% is normally allowed. <br />2. Hardcover variance to permit 1.7% hardccjver within the 0-75’ zone when 3.7% <br />currently exists and 0% is allowed. <br />3. Average lakeshore setback variance to permit construction of a 'A story above the <br />existing second story where the existing house encroaches approximately 9’ to <br />25’ (measuring cast to west) into the required setback. <br />2. <br />Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends: <br />lA. Denial of the reque.stcd 29%. fhe applicant .should be required to comply with <br />the resolution approved in 1989 which specidcally calls for no additional <br />hardcover in excess of the 27% approved at that time. <br />IB. Should the Planning Commission find that the level of work proposed constitutes <br />review as a rebuild rather than a renovation, staff would recommend that no <br />hardc(»ver variance be granteil. <br />Denial of the hardcover variance request Ibr the 0-75’ zone. The applicant has <br />already removed the 286 s.f boat enchisure and was re(|uired to remove it in <br />1989. The 230 s.f. of fabric me.sh .should also be removed for a total 0-75’ <br />hardcover |K*reentage of 0%. <br />3A. Approval of the average lakeshore setback variance as the property is locateil at <br />the mouth of what is known as ('asco Cove, where the neighbor to the northeast <br />only has views northea.st over the ojren water and the neighbor to the southwest <br />only has views within the cove. <br />3B. Should the Planning Commission determine that the level of work propo.scd <br />constitutes review as a rebuild rather than a renovation, staff would recommend <br />__ that the exi .sting encroachment Ik maintainerl but nothing further