My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-28-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
02-28-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2023 10:51:41 AM
Creation date
1/11/2023 10:25:30 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
422
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
#05-3081 Stoncbay Lons <br />Janusry 13,2005 <br />PiBc7 <br />Landscaping, Lighting, Signage <br />Landscape Plan . Planning Commission should review tlie landscape plan. Preliminary review by staff <br />indicates an acceptable level ofplantings of trees and shrubs. TheCity’s landscaping consultant will be <br />asked to conunent. In general, the41,000s.f.buildingfootprintrequires 1 overstory lice per 1,000 s.f. <br />footprint, or 41 such trees. At least 30% of required overstory trees must be coniferous. Applicants <br />propose 5 asli, 10 maple, 15 quaking aspen, and 4 weeping willow, plus 3 spruce and 1 2 ornamental trees <br />(wliich count 2-1 toward tlie overstory requirement); doing the math, tlic total reaches 43, altlioiigli tlic mix <br />should include more conifers. Tlie 41 ,u JO s.f. building would also require 1 37 simibs as a minimum; this <br />standard is more than met, with approximately 300 shrubs shown on the plan. <br />Lighting . Tlie developer should be asked to describe all outside ligliting proposed fur this bui Iding other than <br />the typical street lights, and provide a lighting plan sheet for such lighting. <br />Sienaee . Tlie developer should indicate any identi fication signage intended for tlie building. Some site traffic <br />signage is noted on Sheet C2.1. <br />Impervious Surface Coverage. Impervious smfacecoveiage in tlieRPUD District is limited to 50%. While <br />Sheet C2.1 indicates the Lofts site has 52.4% impervious area, the Stonebay project in its entirety has an <br />impervious area well below the 50% limit, so this is not an issue in staffs opinion. <br />Engineer’s Comments <br />Please review the City Engineer ’s comments, Exhibit D. <br />Final Plat <br />Outlol R w.'is created specifically for the Lofts, and must be final jilattcd as a Lot in order for it to be used <br />as a building site. The final platting proce.ss establishes the necessary perimeter drainage and utility <br />casements which were not required of it as an oullot. The required wetland Conservation and Flowagc <br />Rasement was established during the eai licr subdivision ajiprovals, so that need not be required; however, <br />the wetlands should be shown on the new plat drawings. No plat drawings have been submitted by tlie <br />applicant at this time. <br />'riiisapproval process is functionallyapprovalofPhasc2oftheSloncbayrcsidcntial development. Phase <br />2 final plat appmval will include payment ofpark fees, sewer and water connection fees, and stormwater <br />& drainage trunk fees established within Exhibit M of the PUD 4 Agreement.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.