My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-28-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
02-28-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2023 10:51:41 AM
Creation date
1/11/2023 10:25:30 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
422
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
#05-3081 Stoncbay Lofti <br />January 13» 2005 <br />Page 4 <br />The cim enl proposal is for a single L-shaped building, in virtually the same footprint as the originally <br />projx)sed garage level, but filing in the open terrace space witli building. The applicants note tliat tliis allows <br />for larger individual units and provides spaces for certain amenities not provided in the original concept. <br />These include aparty roo:n/hot tub/cxcrcisc room at the rear ofthe garage level; an undefined common <br />space and a party room at the southeast corner of the fi rst floor level; and an undefined conniion space <br />(i nd i vidual storage? mechanical?) above tliat of the first floor. The lobby is located along the soutli facade, <br />100' finm the east end ofthe building. The proposed 62 individual dwelling units range from 1400 sf to <br />1700 sf in area. <br />The proposed building will have a visual fixjnt (south) facade of376' and an east facade of about 240'. The <br />southeast outside comer is angled to parallel the angled street lot line, with a setback of about 18’ from the <br />adjacent street. The overall building is proposed in approximately the same location with generally the <br />same setbacks as originally approved. <br />Planmng Commission should discuss the pluses and minuses of tlie one-building proposal as compared to <br />the two separated buildings, in terms of amenities gained or lost, visual impact, etc. <br />Site Circulation. Parking . While the exterior parking layout and circulation is generally as originally <br />approved, access to the garages has been significantly revised. Rather than an entrance/exit at each end, <br />tlie garage will now have a single entrance/exit at the southeast comer ofthe building, accessing directly to <br />Cascade L ane. The City Engineer ha.s recommended tliat a second garage access be developed. The <br />Orono Fire Marshal has been asked to comment on this, and we expect to have his comments before the <br />meeting. <br />The exterior front parking lot ranges fr om 3 to 5 feet above street level, with a 3:1 landscaped slope <br />between the street sidewalk and the parking area. The front parking lot is one-way, with angled stalls, and <br />meets the required 20' lot line setback. <br />Tlie City has aparking requirement of 2.0 stalls per unit. The plan layout shows a total of 78 standard and <br />4 HC accessible stalls in the garage level; and 21 standard and 2 accessible stalls in the defined parking <br />area on site. Adding the 7 parallel stalls directly abutting the site on Kelley Parkway, tlie total is 112 stalls <br />or 1.81 per unit, rather than the 2.1 indicated on the plans. The City requirement is 2.0 stalls per unit, or <br />a total of 122; the plan appears to be 10 stalls short. Applicant must define where an additional 10 <br />stalls cun be found. Stall will not support a variance to the minimum parking requirement.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.