Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />t <br />#05-3081 Stonebay Loftt <br />February 10,2005 <br />Pages <br />Landscaping. Review of the landscape plan by staffindicates an acceptable level ofplanlings of <br />trees and shrubs. In general, the 37,300 s.f building footprint requires 1 ovcrslory tree per 1,000 <br />s.f. footprint, or 37 sueh trees. At least 30% of required overstory trees must be coniferous. <br />Applicants propose 2 American linden, 6 ash, 4 maple, 7 quaking aspen, 12 white spruce and 6 <br />Japanese larch, plus 10 ornamental trees (which count 2-1 toward the overstory requirement); <br />doing the math, the total reaches 42. The 37,300 s. f. building would also require 124 shrubs as <br />a minimum; this standard is more than met, with approximately 220 slmibs shown on the plan <br />Tlicbcmibetwceti the condo building and the public works site will be heavily plantal with with <br />a mix oftrees, primarily evergreens. The Landscape Plan, Sheet L2.1 , appears to show additional <br />tree plantings that were to be part of the overall Stonebay project, both along Kelley Parkway and <br />onthetopofthewestendbenn. Our assumption is that these berm plantings are still intended; <br />this will have to be clarified, as the planting schedule does not include them. <br />8)Ligliting. Applicant has verbally indicated the ligliting for this building and this site will be relatively <br />minimal. Prior to Council approval of tlie final development plan, applicant mu.st provide a lighting <br />plan to confirm that all outdoor fixtures are shielded as required by code. <br />9) Signage. The developer should indicate any identification signage intended for the building, wliich <br />will require Council approval. Site traffic signage is noted on Sheet C2.1. <br />For a more detailed review of the issues considered by the Planning Commission at their January and <br />February meetings, please see the memos of January 13 and January 28, as well as the drafi minutes <br />of the January 18 and February 2 Planning Commission meetings. <br />Engineer*s Comments <br />Applicants have addressed the City Engineer’s comments noted in Tom Kel logg’s letter of January 11 . <br />Review of the most recent plans has generated a question of how will roof drainage be handled - applicant <br />should address this, as the sidewalks and parking areas arc quite close to the building. <br />tin it Types and Mix <br />Sheet A-2 indicates there will be four unit sizes/'styles: <br />24 units:‘Oakwood’- 1362 s.f. -1+ bedrooms, 2 hath <br />3 units;‘Birch’- 1549 s.f.-2 bedrooms, 2 baths <br />18 units:‘Elmwood’- 1591 s.f.-2 bedrooms, 2 baths <br />11 units:‘Aspen*- 1653 s.f-2 r bedrooms, 1 bath <br />1 unit: <br />57 units <br />Guest suite - 1250 sf± <br />Applicants have indicated the starling price range will be in the low .S200s.