My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-14-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
02-14-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2023 10:43:33 AM
Creation date
1/11/2023 10:24:46 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
309
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />t <br />#05-3081 Stonebay Loftt <br />February 10,2005 <br />Pages <br />Landscaping. Review of the landscape plan by staffindicates an acceptable level ofplanlings of <br />trees and shrubs. In general, the 37,300 s.f building footprint requires 1 ovcrslory tree per 1,000 <br />s.f. footprint, or 37 sueh trees. At least 30% of required overstory trees must be coniferous. <br />Applicants propose 2 American linden, 6 ash, 4 maple, 7 quaking aspen, 12 white spruce and 6 <br />Japanese larch, plus 10 ornamental trees (which count 2-1 toward the overstory requirement); <br />doing the math, the total reaches 42. The 37,300 s. f. building would also require 124 shrubs as <br />a minimum; this standard is more than met, with approximately 220 slmibs shown on the plan <br />Tlicbcmibetwceti the condo building and the public works site will be heavily plantal with with <br />a mix oftrees, primarily evergreens. The Landscape Plan, Sheet L2.1 , appears to show additional <br />tree plantings that were to be part of the overall Stonebay project, both along Kelley Parkway and <br />onthetopofthewestendbenn. Our assumption is that these berm plantings are still intended; <br />this will have to be clarified, as the planting schedule does not include them. <br />8)Ligliting. Applicant has verbally indicated the ligliting for this building and this site will be relatively <br />minimal. Prior to Council approval of tlie final development plan, applicant mu.st provide a lighting <br />plan to confirm that all outdoor fixtures are shielded as required by code. <br />9) Signage. The developer should indicate any identification signage intended for the building, wliich <br />will require Council approval. Site traffic signage is noted on Sheet C2.1. <br />For a more detailed review of the issues considered by the Planning Commission at their January and <br />February meetings, please see the memos of January 13 and January 28, as well as the drafi minutes <br />of the January 18 and February 2 Planning Commission meetings. <br />Engineer*s Comments <br />Applicants have addressed the City Engineer’s comments noted in Tom Kel logg’s letter of January 11 . <br />Review of the most recent plans has generated a question of how will roof drainage be handled - applicant <br />should address this, as the sidewalks and parking areas arc quite close to the building. <br />tin it Types and Mix <br />Sheet A-2 indicates there will be four unit sizes/'styles: <br />24 units:‘Oakwood’- 1362 s.f. -1+ bedrooms, 2 hath <br />3 units;‘Birch’- 1549 s.f.-2 bedrooms, 2 baths <br />18 units:‘Elmwood’- 1591 s.f.-2 bedrooms, 2 baths <br />11 units:‘Aspen*- 1653 s.f-2 r bedrooms, 1 bath <br />1 unit: <br />57 units <br />Guest suite - 1250 sf± <br />Applicants have indicated the starling price range will be in the low .S200s.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.