My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-14-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
02-14-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2023 10:43:33 AM
Creation date
1/11/2023 10:24:46 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
309
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I. <br />Mr. Carlson indicated the majority of what would be seen from Highway 12 would be the landscaping <br />and the monument sign. <br />Mrs. Carlson illustrated on the architectural drawing the portions of the building that would be visible <br />from Highway 12, noting the front entrance and glass stairwell would be the portion most visible. <br />Jurgens inquired what color schemes were planned for the roofs. <br />Mrs. Carlson slated the roofs would bo an earth tone and not a shiny metal. Carlson indicated the exact <br />color selections have not been determined at this time. <br />Richard Apple, 2101 Sugarwoods Drive, indicated he also has the same concerns expressed by <br />Commissioner Winkey with the use of the name Sugarwoods and the amount of traffic that could <br />mistakenly turn into tlte residential area. Apple stated in light of the amount of money being spent to <br />develop this project, the brochures could be changed to reflect a new name. Apple inquired about the <br />parking requirements for this development. <br />Gundlach indicated the parking standards adopted in the City’s zoning ordinance were adopted in <br />approximately 1974 and it uses a general office designation. Gundlach stated due to the number of office <br />condo developments that have been constructed, the parking requirements arc fairly well understood and <br />the city’s planning consultant determined that 3.S parking stalls are needed per 1000 square feet. <br />Apple inquired about the maintenance of these buildings since they will be independently owned. <br />Mrs. Carlson indicated there would be an office owners association that dictates that the buildings remain <br />uniform and retain their original color scheme. Carlson stated tlie roofs would be similar to those on the <br />city office buildings. <br />Winkey noted the parking standards were based on the fact that there would not be a medical clinic or <br />other higli trairic use located on this site. Winkey inquired whether tliose types of businesses would be <br />restricted from owning one of the units. <br />Gundlach stated when it was originally zone R-6 RPUD, the parking requirements were reviewed in <br />relation to a medical ofnee since that is what was originally proposed, and it was determined that the site
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.