My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-14-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
02-14-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2023 10:43:33 AM
Creation date
1/11/2023 10:24:46 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
309
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
F-V .. <br />Gundlach indicated all stormwater will be collected via catch basins and transported via underground <br />storm sewers to the existing storm sewer system serving the Orono Woods senior housing site, <br />discharging to the existing NURl* pond located at the nortliwest comer of Brown Road North and existing <br />Highway 12. <br />Access to the site consists of a shared right-in/right*out driveway access directly to Highway 12 and a <br />shared driveway access eastward tlu*ough the Orono Woods site to Brown Road North. <br />The applicant has submitted proposed exterior finish materials consisting of a light and dark color stucco <br />material, metal grills affixed directly to the facades, and glass, with an all-metal roof. Stall finds that tliu <br />materials proposed meet the standards established of the B *6 code. <br />Gundlach stated issues for discussion should include the following: <br />1. Should pedestrian access to Orono Woods and Highway 12 be required. <br />2. The coimection to Outlot D, Sugarwoods, at the northwest corner of die site, also creates a <br />turn-around at the dead-end portion of the parking lot. Because a service road docs not currently <br />exist, a variance may be required to allow a parking lot encroacliincnt to the 10-foot setback <br />requirement. <br />3. Is an open space calculation of 39 percent adequate. <br />A. Does tlie aichitccture proposed have a positive impact on tlie landscape. <br />Staff is recommending this application be tabled (o address the seven items outlined in January 18,2005 <br />Planner's Report. Ciundlach noted a landscape plan, signage plan, and a lighting plan must be submitted. <br />Gundlach indicated should the Planning Commission find all the plans to be acceptable with the <br />exception of the lighting, signage, and hnid.scaping plan, a favorable recommendation to the council could <br />he taken, with the seven stipulations being addressed prior to tJic council review or prior to the final plat <br />application. <br />Gina ('arlson addrc.sscd the City Council regarding the proposal, noting that they arc taking the concept of <br />n townhome and turning it into office lownhomes where the (kmsoii would own the building as well as the <br />ground undemcath. Carlson Indicated 10 bulldirip aie proposed lor tliis site, witli tlic potential for 10
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.