My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-14-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
02-14-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2023 10:43:33 AM
Creation date
1/11/2023 10:24:46 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
309
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
^10 OS-3080INTERSPACE-WKST, INC, 2060 WAVZATA BOULEVARD - PUD <br />AMENDMENT, FINAL PLAT, 9:01 p.m. -10:16 p.m. <br />Gina Carlson, Interspace, Philip Carlson, Interspace, and Dan I .arson, Engineer, were present. <br />Oundlach the applicant is requesting a B>6 PUD General Concept Plan approval, preliminary plat <br />approval, commercial site plan approval, and casement vacations in order to construct 20 units of office <br />condominiums on 10 lots and one common lot to be known as Sugarwoods Office Center. The property <br />consists of 2.6 acres and is located ju.st west of the Orono Woods Senior Housing Development. The <br />proposed condos will be two-story walkouts containing approximately 34,186 sqiiprc feel of gross square <br />footage. Each building will contain a walkout level, a main floor level, and a second story mezzanine. <br />Gundlach indicated approval of this project first requires general concept plan approval, preliminar/ plat <br />approval and commercial site plan approval, followed by general development plan, ea.sement vacation, <br />and final plat approvals and an amendment to PUD Agreement No. 2A. <br />Gundlach noted in tlie spring of 2003 an office-condo development was proposed fur the site, witli a site <br />layout that included buildings with south and east-facing walkouts. While that plan was generally looked <br />upon favorably by the Planning Commission and Council, the applicants ultimately concluded tliey could <br />not reduce the number of uni& or square footage in order to meet the parking stall minimums established <br />for their proposed use. <br />Gundlach stated the proposed plan does comply with the goals of tlie Community Management Plan and <br />Comprehensive Plan. TItc proposal meets the requirements for lot area, lot width, and setback <br />requirements. Tlie applicant also complies witli building hciglit regulations. Gundlach noted the <br />applicant would be lowering the site four to eight feet with some cuts as large as 10 to 15 fed. The site <br />will be lowered overall and carved out in the rear to create a walkout situation. In addition, berming nnd <br />retaining walls arc proposed for the north end to lessen the impacts of adjoining neighbors. <br />The applicants have proposed 103 parking stalls, which is in compliance with the 3.5 stalls |)ci 1000 <br />square feet recommended by die City Engineer and planning consultant. Gundlach noted this is not the <br />actual regubition in the City’s current zoning ordinance, which does not uddi css this type of use.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.