My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-24-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
01-24-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2023 10:39:08 AM
Creation date
1/11/2023 10:24:08 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
248
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />MINUTRS OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, Janaary 10,2005 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(#04-3016 Wayzata Design and Dcvchpmcnt, Continncd) <br />prior to completion of the road. Staff has concerns with regard to contamination of the road base by <br />vehicular traffic during road construction, with the City ’s Code reading that “building permits will not be <br />issued to any lot which lot has access only onto proposed public or private street unless such street has <br />been improved to the point so that it is adequate for vehicular access by the prospective occupant and by <br />police and fire department and emergency vehicles.” It is Staffs recommendation that no building <br />permits be authorized or issued until the road base and initial bituminous layer have been installed, <br />subject to approval by the City Engineer. <br />McMillan inquired whether dirt would be stockpiled on the site where the existing house is located. <br />Gaffron stated that is what they are proposing at the present time. <br />McMillan inquired whether a make-shifl road would be constructed in order to remove the existing house. <br />Lazniarz indicated they would comply with the City ’s existing codes concerning the road. <br />Gaffron stated a second item of concern is the applicant’s desire to place a dollar limit on his obligation to <br />pay for City expenses related to the subdivision. Staff docs not support the inclusion of such a limit <br />wdthin the developer’s agreement unless the limit is .set so high as to cover all conceivable expenses. <br />Gaffron stated the homeowmer association covenants have been provided and are included within <br />Council ’s packets. <br />Gaffron noted the applicant has proposed no temporary or pennanent subdivision identification or <br />monument signage for this subdivision; although such signage is contemplated within the proposed <br />covenants. Such signage would need City approval and permits and must conform to location and design <br />standards. Gaffron noted no street lighting has been proposed, with t'lc neighboring property owners <br />expressing opposition to any street lighting. Orono ’s City Code at the present time does not require street <br />lighting. <br />Lazniarz stated they are in agreement with Gaffron on removing Item 3 contained in the developer’s <br />agreement and that they would comply with City Code as it relates to Item 2. <br />Mayor Peterson inquired about Item #1 dealing with a fund or funding mechanism for the homeowners <br />association. <br />I.azniar/ staled he would leave that up to the Council. <br />Wliitc inquired whether the City could require private homeowners to remove dead trees on their <br />property. <br />Gaffron stated the City can. <br />PAGE 4 <br />J
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.