My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-18-1991 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
03-18-1991 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2022 2:34:43 PM
Creation date
12/14/2022 2:13:51 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
286
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
m 9H <br />rr;.- <br />Zoning File #1457 <br />March 14, 1991 <br />Page 5 of 8 <br />Lot 1, <br />Lot 2, <br />Lot 1, <br />Lot 2, <br />Lot 1, <br />Lot 3, <br />Lot 5, <br />Block 1 <br />Block 1 <br />Block 2 <br />Block 2 <br />Block 3 <br />Block 3 <br />Block 3 <br />- southwest corner drainfield site only <br />Grading/Erosion Control/Landscape <br />Review Exhibit J. Erosion control steps have been defined within <br />the note section but have not been defined on the preliminary grading <br />plan and should be shown as they were on the original grading plans <br />for the 16~lot proposal. <br />The entrance monuments proposed (Exhibit I) are the same approved <br />by the Planning Commission for the 16-lot plat except that now 3' <br />berms are shown on the grading plans. Exhibit J, where the entrance <br />monuments are to be placed which may impact the total height. <br />Although monument locations have not been shown on the current set of <br />plans, based on our knowledge of the original location it would appear <br />the monuments are to be placed within berm area. As monuments exceed <br />3' in height, they are subject to standards under Seciton 10.03, Subd. <br />16 - traffic visibility. <br />Landscaping is proposed within the entrance area of the <br />subdivision. Formal landscaping plans have not been proposed as <br />developer feels the natural physical amenities of this property <br />provide the desired effects. <br />Review Exhibit C. Cook asks for a flood control structure within <br />Outlot C. The flood control structure was required originally to <br />protect the drainfield sites on Lots 4 and 5, Block 1. Later in the <br />review, the on-site evaluator shot more detailed elevations of the, <br />area and confirmed that the proposed sites of the septic drainfields <br />are located out of the 970 elevation. The land alteration shown now <br />in Outlot C are merely a berm to connect to the dry buildable land <br />area within Outlot C. Topographic map has been amended to reflect <br />actual location of the 970 elevation in relation to the septic sites. <br />The easements referred to by surveyor as floodage easements or pond <br />easements should be shown on the final plat as drainage easements. <br />Review of Items to be Addressed by Applicant or Applicant's <br />Consultants <br />1. Issue of drainage easements that intersect building envelopes of <br />lots - need to exclude these areas from dry buildable unless they <br />are realigned along the boundaries of proposed lots. Variances <br />will be required for current lot layout.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.