Laserfiche WebLink
F <br /><■ • <br />' i'. <br />Crystal Creek Subdivision <br />March 13, 1991 <br />Page 3 of 3 <br />- Version #9 (3/12/91) <br />General Comments, Re: Septic Systems - <br />Each proposed lot contains approved primary and alternate <br />drainfield sites. All sites require mound systems due to soil <br />conditions. <br />Because road construction and swale construction will allow <br />grading traffic over a wide ranging area of this property, and <br />because in many cases thv two drainfield sites shown are the only <br />available sites for a given lot, it is critical that those sites <br />be protected during road and swale/berm construction. Where <br />drainfield sites are relatively near actual grading areas, <br />fencing should surround those sites. Where sites are remote from <br />any anticipated construction activity, minimal fencing (i.e. <br />posts and rope) may suffice. These protected measures should <br />remain until all grading work on the property is complete. <br />In addition to the documentation needed for the relocated <br />drainfield sites on Lot 2, Block 2 and Lot 5, Block 3, a review <br />of the septic information submitted by S-P Testing and a review <br />of versions #1-8 of the site and grading plans reveals that <br />although percolation/boring hole locations have been shown, they <br />have not been numbered so it is impossible to known which hole is <br />which on each lot. This information is necessary and should be <br />provided by S-P Testing or shown on a copy of the plat drawings.