My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-18-1991 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
03-18-1991 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2022 2:34:43 PM
Creation date
12/14/2022 2:13:51 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
286
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Crystal Creek Subdivision <br />March 13/ 1991 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />- Version #9 (3/12/91) <br />Lot 2, Block 2 (was Lot 1, Block 4) - These drainfield <br />sites have been shifted westward to accommodate the 50' <br />future road right-of-way at the east end of the lot. <br />Documentation must be provided from the site evaluator <br />indicating that this shift is feasible. <br />Lot 1/ Block 3 - A significant berm is proposed adjacent to <br />the south end of the southwesterly site. This site must be <br />fenced off during road and berm construction to guarantee no <br />traffic over it. <br />Lot 2, Block 3 - No changes from previous information. The <br />sites are suitably located and at the east end of the lot. <br />Lot 3, Block 3 - No change from previous plans. The <br />drainfield sites are fairly close to the walkout side of the <br />house/ so placement of the house closer to the road would be <br />beneficial from a septic standpoint. Note that because <br />there will be swale construction through this lot/ the <br />drainfield sites should be protected from extraneous <br />traffic. <br />Lot 4» Block 3 - No change from previous plans. Grading of <br />the swale must not allow traffic uphill into the mound <br />sites. <br />Lot 5, Block 3 - Drainfield sites have been shifted to the <br />south and southeast to accommodate the relocated roadway. <br />Documentation must be submitted from the site evaluator <br />indicating that the relocation is feasible. These sites <br />should be fenced off to protect them from road construction <br />on the north and swale construction on the east. <br />Review of Walking Trails/Bike Trails - <br />The trail system proposed in the north half of the property <br />will for the most part have no impact on drainfield sites. If <br />there is a trail connection between the end of the private road <br />to be constructed and the east side of Lot 2, Block 2, along the <br />south lot line/ that bike trail will be fairly close to the <br />drainfield sites on that lot. Depending on the width and <br />construction of the bike path/ this might or might not be a <br />problem. <br />In the northeast end of the property/ in what used to be Lot <br />1, Block 3 in version #7/ the drainfield sites need to hug the <br />east lot line at the top of the hill. A bike path adjacent to <br />the lot line in this area would have a negative effect on those <br />sites and should be rerouted to miss tho>e sites if a bike trail <br />in that area is developed.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.