Laserfiche WebLink
■ 3 <br />Zoning File #1628 <br />March 8, 1991 <br />Page 2 <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A <br />Exhibit B <br />Exhibit C <br />Exhibit D <br />Exhibit E <br />Exhibit F <br />Exhibit G <br />Exhibit H <br />Exhibit I <br />Exhibit J <br />Exhibit K <br />- Application <br />- Property Owners List <br />- Plat Map/Average Lakeshore Setback Sketch <br />- Resolution #1509 <br />- Existing Hardcover Fact Sheet, 75-250‘ Setback <br />- Proposed Hardcover Fact Sheet, 75-250' Setback <br />- Survey/Site Plan <br />■1 & H-2 - Street Elevation & Staff Worksheet for Height <br />Elevation Determinations <br />- Kitchen/Basement Plans <br />- Elevations <br />- Floor Plans <br />Review of Current Application - <br />In 1983 the previous owner was granted setback variances for the <br />enlargement of the detached garage located 9+ feet from the street lot <br />line. Review Exhibit D, a backout apron has been maintained on the <br />site and structure has been maintained as a detached accessory garage <br />as required by the earlier variance approval. The applicants propose <br />an approximate 20' x 60’ addition consisting of three levels with <br />lakeside deck. The foundation under the existing structure is to be <br />replaced. The existing 3-season porch and lakeside deck may also be <br />removed. These determinations are to be made at a future date by <br />contractor in charge of improvement project. Reviotif Exhibit C. <br />Portions of the addition and the existing residence are located in <br />front of the average lakeshore setback line. Applicants seek approval <br />of a variance not only for the addition and new foundation but for the <br />three season porch and deck that may be replaced. <br />Applicant should be asked to provide additional information as to <br />future plans for basement area. The applicant should be placed on <br />notice of the need for a future conditional use permit if a guest <br />apartment is ever planned. <br />In seeking approval of the variance for encroaching the average <br />setback line, the applicant notes the shape of the shoreline and the <br />difficulties of adhering to the a>;^erage setback line for the property <br />located on a point. Staff would add the steep topography along the <br />west side limits any view impact from lakeview windows of cabin. The <br />mature plantings that exist on the adjacent western lot and subject <br />property provides natural screening. It should also be added the <br />house was placed on the property prior to lakeshore regulations and <br />that all other setback and hardcover standards are met by the expanded <br />structure. <br />5 . J „ <br />i t y / v |»