My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-15-1991 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1991
>
07-15-1991 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2022 1:03:54 PM
Creation date
12/14/2022 12:45:34 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
272
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r t <br />\.. <br />LV'. <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 19, 1990 <br />ZONING FILE #1606-BIG ISLAND, INC. CONTINUED i^ <br />ZONlNG^PILEJnin, emission agreed as a wno e <br />to see this application approvea, provicaa all aspects oc sarety, <br />legal liability, etc. can be properly adcressea. <br />MS. Deborah Page, a representative of Erickson's owne^ <br />nf land adiacent to the subject property, stated that she haa <br />eonf a letter *to the Planning Commission members expressing her <br />client's concerns She said. "If City Staff works with Big <br />Isianl Inc., I believe that my client’s concerns will be <br />addressed." <br />Cohen suggested that Ms. Page may wish to also work with <br />City Staff and Big Island, Inc. <br />There were no further comments from the public and the <br />Public Hearing was continued. <br />It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Moos, to table <br />application #1606, Big Island, Inc. Motion, Ayes-6. Nays- . <br />Motion carried. <br />Mr. Sid Rebers, M.r. Stephen Pflaum, Mr. <br />and Mr. Bob Kost were present. <br />Rabers' attorney, <br />Mr. Pflaum began by providing a history of the events that <br />tak“n olace to determine how these requests would <br />addressed by the City, Planning Commission and Council. He <br />the soecific request before the* Planning Commission <br />this evening. Ha said, "This house meets the design criteria of <br />the Sugarwoods Comprehensive Plan. The ^ ,p-eowners are due to move in shortly. me <br />orope^ty owners do not want to have the turn-around located in <br />the^front yard, adjacent to the house. They would prefer it t <br />be on the^ocher side. It is myfnntaae of the drivev/ay and turn-around would be less than tne <br />driveway approved with the building permit. However, the <br />irfs -g°est <br />aUowir^"°?he°"property^°o'wne?s "htve ^co^si^ed Everything and are allowed. me . design and aesthetic issuenow asking for more space. This is a aes> y <br />with the homeov;ner. <br />In the future, to avoid this situation from occurrinc after <br />rha hoLe is coLtructed, we would ask the builders to work with <br />sSiff sTth\\ be brought before the Planning <br />Commission before the uuilding permit is this <br />nrnhablv be cominq before you with a majority of the lots in cnis <br />ISwtviLon. Se La also Lnsidaring an abbreviated procedure <br />- 17 - <br />1 <br />i>aii
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.