Laserfiche WebLink
If KP E» » <br />Zoning File #1606 <br />July 5, 1991 <br />Page 3 <br />2.For profit association as a legal applicant. Big <br />Island, Inc. is made up of unrelated individuals who <br />meet at Big Island for group activity. All are <br />permitted activities under RS Code. There is nothing <br />in the Code that suggests this association/private club <br />must be a non-profit club or association. <br />B.Membership versus total area. Ms. Shapiro has ^iso reviewed <br />the by-laws as they relate to membership and number o <br />shareholders, noting that total membership at 100 with an <br />average family size of 2.5 could result in 250 persons in <br />attendance at one time. Please refer to Page 2 and 3 of <br />applicant ’s letter. Exhibit G. Mr. Judd advises that your <br />code discusses number of users and not membership. The <br />number of users at any one must be limited to 100. Judd <br />advises that the average number of weekday users is less <br />than 10 and the average number of weekend users at any given <br />time is less than 20. 2 to 3 times during a summer season <br />users may exceed 50. If the club were to ever have a group <br />function that involves r.''re than 100 users, a large assembly <br />permit would be rev- .-..Ji. In the Big Island Vets Camp <br />application, the City asked for the number of veterans <br />that were part of th • -> sociation but merely limited the <br />user level to the exist _*ig area. The Code limits the number <br />of users for Big Island, Inc. to 100 at any one time. <br />Conpliance with Standards of Section 10.31# Subdivision 3 (C)(l”"9) <br />Please review to Exhibit E and Pages 4 and 5 of Exhibit G, <br />applicant's response. Staff can confirm that upon an inspection <br />of the facility during the winter months that a majority of those <br />standards were satisfied by the association. The need ® <br />phone has been met. The applicant ’s confirm installation of nor <br />only a phone within the cabin but one has been installed in the <br />screened porch section of the cabin that is always open or <br />public use. Both septic inspectors have made an inspection of <br />the facility this summer and noted no problem with the exist ng <br />septic system. This use has not involved an intensified <br />development of the property and there is much available suitabl <br />land for on-site septic use. The septic inspector will also be <br />advised that this is one facility that should be inspected on an <br />annual basis and should be made a condition of this approval. <br />Photos have been taken by staff at the time of their <br />inspection of the facility in the winter. Photos were taken of <br />the interior of the cabin and exterior. Staff confirms th^ <br />facility provides minimal/low profile uses consistent with the <br />purpose of the RS District.