Laserfiche WebLink
2. Staff sent to each property owner the following <br />documents for approve 1» signature and return: <br />i la .1 <br />a) <br />b) <br />c) <br />d) <br />e) <br />Ordinance Summary <br />Cover Letter <br />Official Record Lot Notice <br />Combined Tax Assessment Request Form <br />Lot Area Variance Resolution <br />3. When documentation was returned, it was taken to Council <br />for final approval and filing in title; or <br />If documentation was not returned by property owner within 6 <br />month deadline, automatic lot area variance was not granted. <br />Owner would have to apply for lot area variance at such time <br />any construction was planned on the property and pay the <br />standard variance application fees. Approximately half of <br />the record lot resolutions have been finalized to date; a <br />few have been returned and are awaiting submittal to <br />Council; many have yet to be returned and finalized. <br />The process of combining lots that are separated by un­ <br />developed rightS“Of—way, known as a "Special Lot Combination , is <br />simply the Record Lot Resolution filed in the chain of title of <br />the affected properties. The County will not combine the ta\es <br />over the right-of-way in most cases, but for zoning purposes the <br />record lot is considered combined and portions may not be resold <br />individually. (Sample resolution - see Exhibit I.) <br />I suggest you re-read all of Section 10.31, Subdivison 6 as <br />a review of the Record Lot Area requirements. Note that the code <br />specifically deals with Mr. Smedberg*s problem and that he really <br />has no choice in whether or not Let C is part of the record <br />once he is the owner of C and 6, 7 & 8. His only recourse would <br />be to ask Council to amend the code. <br />Staff has discussed briefly this division with the applicant <br />and the realtor involved and has had discussions with Mr. <br />Smedberg leading to the letter to him (Exhibit G) which I strong­ <br />ly suggest you read as an outline of the action to date on this <br />property. <br />My memo of 2/11/85 still stands; staff recommends approval <br />of the division of the lakeshore strip for future combination <br />with the respective adjacent properties. <br />Now, remember that the record lot resolutions not only <br />restrict the future sale and use of the Big Island properties, <br />but they grant an automatic lot area variance for those record <br />lots which are buildable but substandard in size. Since the <br />deadline for completion of the required acknowledgments and <br />paperwork was rescinded in this case, ic is appropriate that we <br />now require the applicant and/or the future property owners.to <br />complete the record lot paperwork within 6 months or lose the <br />benefit of the automatic lot variance. <br />in ■' ■