Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1634 <br />April 9, 1991 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />The property was subdivided in approximately 1977 and at the <br />time was zoned R-IA, 5 acre minimum dry contiguous. The property <br />was recently rezoned with the Landmark subdivision application and <br />is now zoned LR-IA, 2 acre minimum lot density. <br />Applicant notes the following hardships; <br />1. Interior layout/design - applicants have been asked to <br />submit interior plans to support hardship (this will not be <br />included in your Wednesday packet). Applicants' consultant <br />has advised that they will be able to make the Friday packet <br />deadline. <br />2. Architectural design of the structure would be destroyed <br />if located at any other side of the house. <br />Staff would add the following; <br />3. The location of the house on the property does not meet <br />either 5 acre (50' side) or 2 acre (30' side) zoning <br />standards. <br />4. Lakeside addition would destroy not only the design, but <br />would allow the structure to encroach further into the <br />average lakeshore setback area. <br />5. Expansion to west is restricted because of existing septic <br />system. <br />r a 6. structure will encroach no closer than the existing <br />structure to the side lot line. <br />Mr. Weckman's memo and septic inventory map (Exhibits H and <br />I) confirm that the proposed addition will not inpact the <br />existing septic system nor burden the existing system with <br />increased use. Weckman doe'=» caution if the loft area is <br />converted to a legal bedroom, t)ie septic system would have to be <br />re-evaluated at that time. <br />The addition at a maximum height of 21%' meets the allowed <br />height requirement of 30'. <br />Options of Action - <br />Denial. If denied, please refer to the necessary findings in <br />your zoning code; or <br />1