Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />1- <br />ii; <br />Zoning File #1619 <br />February 14, 1991 <br />Page 7 <br />Lot 1 - the drainfield sites are located on a relatively <br />flat area at the north half of the lot These sites are <br />about 18* vertically higher than the mi^or wetland to the <br />west, and are located on slopes ranging from 2 to 6%. These <br />sites force the house to be located in tie south half of the <br />lot at the edge of the 40% slope lading down to the <br />wetland. The house location further noith on the lot would <br />leave minimal setbacks to the mound systas and require that <br />a driveway be constructed along the 401 slope, leaving a <br />major cut just downhill from the primazf site. Because of <br />the steep slopes and location of septic ^sterns, this lot is <br />severely limited to a single buildahle envelope being <br />approximately 175* in length and rangia^ in width from 50* <br />to 90', 1^ the Planning Commission and Obuncil allow a 30* <br />setback from the east lot line of Lot 1. <br />Lot 2 - has drainfield sites centrally Israted just north of <br />the small pond. The primary site rangesln slope from 4% in <br />the south end to near 9% at the verj north end. The <br />alternate site just to the west averages 6% slope. These <br />sites are located immediately uphill frea the proposed house <br />site. Due to this, and coupled with a ftrainage swale from <br />the pond being located on the west sideof the house, plus <br />the 50* rear setback requirement, this is at best a very <br />poor building site with drainfield sita that are marginal <br />. due to site topography. <br />A further issue with Lot 2 is that a extremely long <br />driveway will have to be constructed to reach the proposed <br />house location. If Outlot B is allowed as a private drive­ <br />way, the actual driveway length from the proposed house site <br />on Lot 2 to the point of access on Lyan Avenue is 650*. <br />The State Fire Code will likely require ftat the driveway be <br />provide with a turnaround, and be aot less than 20* <br />unobstructed width, hence this will ma]<z a shared driveway <br />on Outlot B just that much tougher to costruct. <br />Lot 3 - contains the existing house whUi has an existing <br />bailing septic system. Both the priary and alternate <br />drainfield sites have been tested on His property. The <br />primary site has a slope of approximatelp 2%, the alternate <br />site has a slope of about 6%. With approximately 40* <br />between the easterly tip of the primaryaound and the east <br />lot line, it might be feasible to relacate the driveway <br />within Lot 3 to a point where it could acess Lyman Avenue <br />within the boundaries of the plat, elimteting the need for <br />a driveway easement on the neighboring property. However, <br />the sight distance for Outlot B's acceia point to Lyman <br />Avenue is already minimal if not unacaeptable, hence an <br />additional access at that location ivy not be a wise <br />decision.