Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1612 <br />January 10, 1991 <br />Page 2 <br />B.Lot Width: <br />Required = 300' <br />Existing « 192.67' <br />Proposed = 182.67' <br />Existing Variance = <br />Proposed Variance = <br />107.33' <br />117.33' <br />or <br />or <br />35% <br />39% <br />* Easement area is excluded from dry buildable for rural <br />zoned property. <br />4085 Watertown Road <br />A.Lot Area: <br />Required = 5 acres <br />Existing = Approximately 28,000 s.f. or .64 acres <br />Proposed =* 29,350 s.f. (additional 1,350 s.f. of deeded <br />area) <br />B. Lot Width: <br />Required <br />Existing <br />Proposed <br />300’ <br />70’ <br />80' <br />Review of Application - <br />Please review applicant’s attorney's addendum. Exhibit D. <br />In 1976 the original owners of 4105 attempted to deed the <br />corridor along the east side of the property that was to be taken <br />over an existing drive that served the residence at 4085 <br />Watertown Road. The property owners were not aware that <br />subdivision approval was required of the City. The deed was <br />accepted by the County for filing, monies were exchanged, but the <br />official plat maps of the County never reflected the subdivision <br />because the City denied the division. The forme- property owners <br />failed to apply for subdivision in 1981, the year the deed was <br />filed. <br />The property at 4085 is currently in the process of being <br />sold to Dale and Paulson. A recent survey of the property <br />revealed that the majority of the drive still remained within <br />4105 Watertown Road (Exhibit E). The owner of 4105 and the new <br />owners of 4085 have filed the subdivision application seeking <br />approval of the lot line rearrangement of the land couidor <br />originally deeded in 1976 and of a new private easement. <br />Issaes for Consideration <br />Lot line rearrangement - If the lot line rearrangement is to <br />be approved, a lot width variance would be required as set forth <br />above. The property has less than 10 acres in area and could not <br />be subdivided based on the current standards. The property at <br />4085 only can benefit by the lot line rearrangement. No setback <br />variances would be required for the structures on 4105 as the <br />principal structure is located at the west side of the parcel.