Laserfiche WebLink
Fy-' <br />> <br />F <br />n Zoning File #16051January 14,1991 <br />'s. - <br />»Page 2 <br />St:a££ would question whether the lower garaqe floor as <br />proposed will meet the required 932,5' regulatory £].ood <br />protection elevation. I£ not, the entire addition couJd be <br />raised in a split-level £ashion to accomplish this, but might <br />create an unusual upper driveway situation. <br />The second story addition in the 0-75' zone has been cut <br />back to allow a second story deck above the existing house, so <br />that there will be no new structural projections outside the <br />footprint of the existing house. <br />Staff RecoBBBendatlon <br />If Planning Commission feels that the proposed additions and <br />hardcover revisions are appropriate, then a recommendation for <br />approval could be based on: <br />1.Reduction in hardcover in 0-75' zone, no increase in <br />hardcover percentage in 75-250' zone. <br />2.Additions above existing house justified by location of <br />existing house in 0-75' zone and no projections outside <br />existing footprint. <br />3.Average setback variance justified by protuding nature <br />of shoreline, with both neighboring houses having views <br />totally unaffected by the proposed average setback <br />encroachment. <br />Conversely, if Planning Commission feels the revised request <br />is not justified, appropriate negative findings would have to be <br />made. <br />Isv