My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-20-1991 Planning Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
02-20-1991 Planning Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2022 11:56:49 AM
Creation date
12/14/2022 11:55:39 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
h <br />'■h <br />ite.i-r.- <br />■ -v'^j <br />r.- ■■," '•. <br />:\' ■ <br />I' ..r <br />PLANNING COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING EIELD FEBRUARY 20, 1991 <br />to west and west to east. Speed may not be our responsibility. <br />Whether it takes ten or twenty minutes to get through Orono, if <br />you can do it safely, then that is the point. <br />If we accept our responsibility as citizens of the State and <br />feel that we must let people get through safely, and yet we <br />maintain our integrity position, which is that there would be no <br />additional corridor in Orono, then logically something needs to <br />be worked out with existing Highway 12." <br />Sally Hauser, said, "I chose to live in Orono because it is <br />a rural community. My husband works in Arden Hills, but wa did <br />not want to live" there. It is my opinion, that those people who <br />wish to live far west and work in Minneapolis can make that <br />choice. If they wish to get to work quickly, they can live near <br />35W in the city. The people living Orono chose to do so because <br />of the environmental characteristics. I have a proposal that <br />I've not yet heard discussed by anyone. As mentioned previously, <br />there are two groups of people wishing to get to two different <br />places. One group wants to get to the Dakotas and others live in <br />the immediate western suburbs. The solution for traffic going to <br />and from the Dakotas, you bring 494 north to Highway 5>. For <br />those living in the western suburbs, a gentle upgrade of the <br />existing Highway 12, using reversible lanes, would solve the <br />traffic congestion. If there are four lanes, three lanes could <br />head east in the morning and three lanes heading west in the <br />evening." <br />Bob Biesterfeld stated that he pi*eviously resided in <br />Willmar. He said, "Western Minnesota is very well served by <br />several major routes, 94, 169 through Mankato, Highway 1?, and <br />Highway 7. Highway 7 lends itself much better for upgrading and <br />v/idening. I agree that we are dealing with two different traffic <br />groups. There is speculation that economies of western cities <br />would improve if more roads serve that area, but that is just <br />speculation. I think we need to address the major issue for <br />local traffic which is getting through Long Lake and Maple Plain. <br />I personally would rather take an additional five minutes to get <br />through Long Lake than have the entire road torn up." <br />Cohen stated that he would like to know how many of the <br />persons present prefer to have nothing done at all. <br />One resident asked why it would not be possible to have one <br />lane of traffic heading east and west elevated over the railroad <br />tracks. He said, "There would be no properties or businesses <br />lost, yet it would alleviate some of the congestion." <br />Another gentlemen stated that it seems the consensus of the <br />residents is that something needs to be done, but that there only <br />be an upgrade and utilization of existing east/west roads. <br />- 3 - <br />m
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.