My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-10-2022 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2022
>
10-10-2022 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2022 1:00:36 PM
Creation date
12/8/2022 12:38:22 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
Text box
ID:
1
Creator:
Created:
12/8/2022 1:00 PM
Modified:
12/8/2022 1:00 PM
Text:
CC Exhibit E LA22-000045
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
331
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Date Application Received: August 16, 2022 <br />Date Application Considered Complete: August 16, 2022 <br />60‐Day Review Period Expires: October 17, 2022 <br /> <br /> <br />To: Chair McCutcheon and Planning Commission Members <br /> Adam Edwards, City Administrator <br /> <br />From: Laura Oakden, Community Development Director <br /> <br />Date: September 19, 2022 <br /> <br />Subject: #LA22‐000045, Addilay Homes o/b/o Robert Hannah, 1153 Elmwood Ave, <br />Variance, Public Hearing <br /> <br /> <br />Background <br />The property currently has a detached garage that encroaches in to the right of way and a deck <br />along the side of the accessory building connecting to the main door of the home. The applicant <br />is proposing to remove the existing garage and build a new garage that is attached to the <br />existing house. The new garage addition will create a new front door to the home and will <br />connect to the existing sidewalk along the south side of the home. Due to the grading and <br />elevation of the home, the new deck is proposed to connect to the existing sidewalk on the <br />south side of the house. <br /> <br />Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicant Submittal Information: The applicant has identified the <br />substandard property, the unique configuration of the right of way bisecting the parcel, and the <br />setbacks of the existing home as practical difficulties supporting the requested variances. <br />Additionally, they have provided supporting documentation regarding Practical Difficulties <br />attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. <br /> <br />Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Regarding practical difficulty, Staff finds the practical <br />difficulty standards are met. The property is substandard as it pertains to size and width. While <br />the home meeting the setbacks for the zoning district there is no conforming building envelope <br />to allow a garage within reasonable proximity to the home. The property is unique due to the <br />right‐of‐way which crosses through the parcel limiting the building envelope. <br /> <br />LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET <br />Section 78‐330 – Setbacks: <br /> <br />DISTRICT LR‐1B Required Existing Proposed <br />Rear/ Street 30’ <br />The existing garage encroaches <br />2’ into ROW, outside of property <br />boundary <br />Home with <br />attached <br />garage 15’ <br />North Side 7.5’ 9.5’ No Change <br />Application Summary: The applicant is requesting street and side yard setback variances. <br />Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.