Laserfiche WebLink
Mer/Water - <br />»nald' 8 <br />^rthwest <br />i site <br />, A <br />led <br />review <br />proposed <br />3ts in <br />sd for <br />Bnt of <br />Eect <br />concentrating <br />is site <br />rs property <br />improvements <br />Therefore <br />view to <br />irely follow <br />lor these <br />reports <br />LIows: <br />rcial <br />i the <br />Dning <br />comp rehen sive <br />on or use. <br />nd adequacy <br />these <br />e proposed <br />#766-767-768 Review <br />Page 2 <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />SnSlSS III <br />remembered that this vision^reviewand is fully subject to the City's subdivision review. <br />This means that the lot size and <br />flexible and can be changed if our review uncovers <br />some reason to require it. The subdivision should not <br />be preliminarily approved until the City <br />that there is sufficient room for drainage facilities, <br />that access concerns have been addressed and that tne <br />restaurant site plan is acceptable. <br />REZONIHG. This is a housekeeping change intended to <br />realign the residential/coromercial district boundary <br />with Wear's existing property line and with logical <br />lot lines on Rebers property. This exact <br />was paeliminarily approved by the Council in 1978 and <br />should be conceptually reappproved subject to final <br />approval occuring at the same time as final subdivision <br />approval so that the zoning line will thereafter conform <br />exactly to final lot line locations. <br />DRAINAGE. The developer must submit detailed drainage <br />plans for review and approval of the City, Minnesota <br />DOT and MCWD. This will likely entail construction of <br />some kind of retention pond which will inturn likely <br />require alteration of the proposed site plan and corner <br />lot size. The additional inflow may also require a public <br />storm sewer project. <br />ACCESS. Commercial access onto Brown Road is not <br />acceptable without major roadway improvements to safely <br />accommodate the traffic, turning movements and delivery <br />truck axle loads. Direct access onto Wayzata Boulevard <br />nmst be limited in nundber and location, meaning the <br />proposed access must be redesigned to serve more than <br />this one use. And serious consideration must be given <br />to providing, or at least planning for, a commercial <br />S0rvice road to serve all the B—1 zone because forseeable <br />channelization of Wayzata Boulevard would otherwise eliminate <br />eastbound access to or from these properties, including <br />McDonald's and the existing Orono Shopping Center. Final <br />comprehensive access plans must be an integral part of the <br />subdivision review at this time. <br />6.UTILITIES. Despite the long-standing 3-1 zoning, there <br />is no sewer or water service to any of the Reber property <br />(Wear has service direct from the City of ^ng Lake but <br />has never been assessed for it by either City). There can <br />be no additional commercial development on any of this property <br />until sewer and water is available, and that can only be <br />done by agreement between Long Lake and Orono, and by <br />construction of new laterals by Orono. We have received <br />a petition for service. An engineering feasibility study <br />should be ordered. <br />#766-767 <br />Page 3 <br />OUTLINE <br />These ap <br />City Dep <br />and the <br />A public <br />review i <br />gather ii <br />Detailei <br />all acc4 <br />After tl <br />theae a] <br />enginee; <br />road an< <br />applica <br />since t) <br />improve <br />Further <br />Council <br />staff h <br />technic <br />*