Laserfiche WebLink
■ <ri <br />mmasB <br />11 <br />Wm <br />:. ■ ' V-'.. ..•, <br />Alan P. Olson, City Planner <br />development review <br />August. 2» 1983 <br />#766-767-768 <br />ISSUE #2 <br />SUBDIVISION application #767 <br />i. o„ «i..w "5‘2t5’ivr.s;» ” " <br />KSi“"c<r‘E°‘.^“^-4iS UcS;.5“s 1..;...— -«■ <br />.ppUoatlon _________ .«.»<' 1 ”“. <br />a purchase agreeiue . _ •«<! that any change eoielv o*' <br />as shown on the economic ‘^®^^®^nonalds. Considerations <br />problems. 4-vnicallY required by McD . ^ land, access <br />S;inin,un, If^^t^dl^l'dralnage? grffS °Lifof City’s <br />?Lations ,^tc^ are jalid^f If these ^consider at ions <br />#4, then the tiry <br />as submitted.as submitted. • with the <br />4- of the subdivision is ^he intent of <br />the'^zoning code. Separatio^^^ fPfitice a?efwhile the <br />Thr"llrge%etidential lot Metropolitan Urban Service <br />^;L"a^d^fined%^he MUSA line. _ _ _ __ <br />re proposed lot lines^are^lo9icaU/^^l|p^^^ <br />f^r'fu^urf resUivision af ^;;f^°P"‘;Se retilt will lively be <br />internal street connecting _ _ _ _ _reouirements -internal street connect. ,eguiren«nts for <br />Lots 1. 3 and 4 Ifewise meet all <br />lot area and width; <br />B-1 required <br />Lot 1 <br />Lot 3 <br />Lot 4 <br />Area (Acre^- --?An^ <br />0.000 s 459) <br />45,838 sf <br />254,570 sf <br />57,930 sf <br />(1.05) <br />(5.84) <br />(1.33) <br />150 ftt <br />520 ftt <br />225 ft <br />- ^ <br />j¥S • <br />-■m i <br />U$mm <br />DEVELOP! <br />ISSUE # <br />Circula <br />of this <br />adequat <br />entire <br />1. <br />A <br />;5%i: