Laserfiche WebLink
5BB3 <br />FORON <br />to my <br />rently <br />, 1983 <br />add to <br />issue, <br />n 1977 <br />year, <br />ime I <br />ill to <br />I was <br />uld be <br />rankly <br />aring. <br />ts you <br />econd, <br />to my <br />states <br />shment <br />tunity <br />and I <br />3y and <br />this <br />ilding <br />ospect <br />3n is <br />hnson, <br />there <br />except <br />’■ ••li-i <br />fm <br />''■I' <br />u 1 <br />'V <br />r.-i <br />mM <br />A- <br />%■' a ♦ <br />\fx <br />( <br />hm^y. <br />■r'.' ■ ■ -'k <br />V • •••' ,.L' - <br />by- <br />I--*" <br />for this common ownership business. In short, you have all the <br />facts necessary to address this common ownership business without <br />any further delay, the application, we apparently agree, is <br />meritorious in all respects, and I feel entitled to a decision on <br />August 15. <br />Finally, I am informed that Jane Remein appeared and complained <br />that my proposed house would be too close to hers, <br />notwithstanding that I will abide by all side setback <br />requirements. Apparently Ms. Remeins* problem is that her house <br />violates setback requirements. I suggest that it would be a <br />gross abuse of your discretion to deny my application in order to <br />protect her inadequate setback. The closeness of the homes is my <br />complaint, not hers. <br />Kindly phone me to respond to the questions I have raised at your <br />early opportunity. <br />^ry. truly yours, <br />Douglasy^. Smith <br />V <br />JEFFREY R. BR/ <br />Attorney at Li <br />August 25, <br />Jeanne Mat <br />Zoning Adir <br />City of Or <br />Box 66 <br />Crystal Ba <br />RE: Doug1 <br />Dear Ms. M <br />This firx <br />applicatio <br />had been 1 <br />recommenda <br />Mr. Smith <br />lot this y <br />Further, N <br />intends tc <br />likely to <br />I request <br />regarding <br />options, <br />requests ft <br />Thank you <br />Very truly <br />Jeffrey R. <br />JRB:kb <br />cc: Douglc