My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-18-1983 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1983
>
07-18-1983 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2023 4:24:12 PM
Creation date
12/7/2022 3:29:00 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i;-i• • - ■ -> =ii -^; «i <br />.-,.C4!? ,!*T^ <br />- Variance - <br />lired) <br />Lred) <br />)% required) <br />)% required) <br />quired) <br />uired) <br />he lot of <br />ards required <br />site and the <br />but notice a <br />d Lots 16 and <br />tained as part <br />79 and found <br />pplicant/owner <br />es on Lots <br />e of all <br />, Planning <br />this <br />rship <br />applicant <br />in his <br />eals that <br />n 1977. <br />967. The <br />ss in his <br />Ordinances <br />>t <br />ince <br />The <br />lat <br />jet the <br />Lp issue <br />mm m-' <br />#761 Douglas Smith <br />3237 Casco Circle <br />Variance <br />Page 2 <br />To act on the variance application for a lot of <br />separate record per the staff survey o <br />vacant lalceshore lots held either in common <br />ownership or separate ownership based on the <br />following findings: <br />Staff accepted the application believing <br />it was merely for a lot area and width <br />variance. <br />b) The proposed development of Lot 18 as a <br />single residential unit is consistent with <br />surrounding pattern of neighborhood <br />development. <br />c) The proposed application does not require <br />any variances. <br />d) Existing garage should be noted as a non- <br />conforming structure and subject to all <br />pertinent ordinances. <br />A. <br />To deny the lot area and lot width variance <br />application finding Lot 18, originally held in <br />common ownership with Lots 16 and 17 prior to <br />1971, .does not meet the required 100% of all <br />lot standards of the LR-IC zoning district. <br />This is a difficult one for both staff and Planning Commission. <br />I would strongly suggest you go with Option 1 and push for <br />resolution of the common ownership issue. <br />f <br />1 <br />,.;V <br />■ <br />'r <br />■%' <br />mi <br />propel <br />and h <br />possit <br />Lot 1 <br />compr : <br />to me <br />ordin< <br />lake, <br />achie^ <br />11. 1 <br />from ; <br />preve <br />use ' <br />plain <br />resid <br />shown <br />ample <br />viola <br />sewer <br />has t <br />has a <br />taxes <br />of $f <br />the < <br />denia <br />would <br />by tl <br />Simil <br />subdi <br />lakef <br />owner
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.