Laserfiche WebLink
569 <br />te <br />e 7 t30-80 <br />cice <br />tional Use Permit <br />s^islon. Preliminary <br />v^ision. Final <br />•k'k'k'frk’irkif'fc'frkic'frk’k'fc'trk'k’k <br />n <br />seawall_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ <br />lake side. <br />ion, but before <br />econsider the <br />tor, and seawall <br />VV>: . ;>v- <br />i - <br />:'kick'k'kirk'k'kicit'k-k'k'k"/cirkirk- <br />be considered <br />s not provided). <br />or work to be <br />ompleted <br />before beginning <br />iroved plans. <br />»ar after approval, <br />lip or use, <br />.de all information <br />let Zoning <br />igs, resolution <br />Lcation of such <br />i>e obtained by <br />from meeting date. <br />L'i-'fSEf <br />F <br />mm <br />Wr-'.hs;. <br />J-S''s* <br />TO: <br />FROM; <br />DATE: <br />SUBJECT; <br />Planning Commission <br />Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator <br />July 14, 1983 <br />#761 Douglas H. Smith, 3237 Casco Circle <br />Lot Area & Lot Width <br />Zoning District - <br />Application - a) <br />LR-IC <br />Lot Area <br />Required <br />Required <br />Existing <br />Variance <br />Variance <br />Lot Width <br />Required • <br />Required <br />Existing <br />Variance <br />Variance <br />= 21,780 sf (100% Required) <br />= 17,424 sf (80% Required) <br />= 16,748 sf or 77% <br />= 5,032 sf or 23% (100% required) <br />r= 676 sf or 3.9% (80% required) <br />100* <br />80' <br />55' <br />45' <br />25' <br />(100% Required) <br />(80% Required) <br />or 45% (100% Required) <br />or 31% (80% Required) <br />This aoplication was accepted on the basis that the lot of <br />separate record did not meet 80% of the lot standards required <br />for the LR-IC zoning district. In reviewing the site and the <br />existing improvements on Lot 18, one cannot help but notice a <br />previous use/ownership connection between combined Lots 16 and <br />17 to the immediate north. The lot is still maintained as part <br />of the yard. I reviewed the tax roles back to 1979 and found <br />that Douglas Smith is the owner of Lot 18. The applicant/owner <br />confirms the sale in 1977. I checked the tax files on Lots <br />16 and 17 and found the enclosed deed for the sale of all <br />three lots to J. Richard Tuthill in June of 1971. Planning <br />Commission has the following options in review of this <br />application; <br />1) To table pending resolution of common ownership <br />question - I'm sure we'll have an unhappy applicant <br />as he is ready to build. Please note that in his <br />addendum to the application, he openly reveals that <br />Lot 18 was separated from Lots 16 and 17 in 1977. <br />The LR-IC zoning district was created in 1967. The <br />applicant has demonstrated complete openness in his <br />responses to the information sought in the <br />application. Once again review enclosed Ordinances <br />31.201 and 31.202. Our applicant could not <br />understand why he had to apply for a variance <br />because he did not meet the 80% standard. The <br />common ownership question will compound that <br />difficulty even more. Hopefully, I will get the <br />opportunity to explain the common ownership issue <br />prior to the meeting.