My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-18-1983 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1983
>
07-18-1983 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2023 4:24:12 PM
Creation date
12/7/2022 3:29:00 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
£a(/U^ &. <br />Page 9 <br />l/ic;UENTHER ROTH <br />1428 Baldur-ParJc <br />Variance <br />#695 <br />t's <br />ted <br />ion <br />ses <br />te <br />1-sijv;. <br />5C <br />^ ■- <br />m <br />'X. <br />• ti- <br />ii-. <br />A <br />*r-v <br />-V <br />I mumM MSMHMfdMBS <br />MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 19, 1982 Page 10 <br />McDonald noted that the Planning Commission hadn't <br />decided which side of the road they preferred the <br />proposed structure to be on. <br />Rovegno felt that it should stay roughly the same with <br />a two stall garage and the second story. <br />Kelley suggested that the workshop be added onto the <br />existing house. That way he could heat the workshop <br />year round. <br />Opheim stated that it was a strange lot yith the lake <br />and that the total issue is how much additional hardcover <br />would they be approving. If the applicant proposed a <br />"normal" sized garage that he wouldn't have any problem <br />with it. <br />Rovegno stated that if it was built on the house side it <br />would be out of the 75' setback area. He suggested that <br />it be put on the side of the house away from the 0-75' <br />setback line. <br />Opheim stated once again that if the applicant came up <br />with a normal two stall garage put it on the same <br />side as the existing garage, in replacement of that garage <br />it would be better. <br />Rovegno noted the erosion problem and suggested that the <br />shoreline may need smoe rip rap. <br />Goetten suggested that the garage should be on the same <br />side of the street as the existing structure and suggested <br />soil borings be done for determining if the soil could <br />handle such a structure. <br />Kelley felt the same side as the existing garage, two <br />stall and two story. <br />Hammerel concurred with Kelley. <br />McDonald suggested a two stall garage on side of house <br />(lot 8) and no second story. <br />Rovegno stated that the other side of the street would <br />be fine as long as they, directed the drainage away from <br />the lake. Two story, reduce size, and don't increase <br />the hardcover. <br />Opheim stated that the proposed structure should be on <br />the side where current garage is. The structure should <br />be two stalls and soil borings should be done to determine <br />whether the soil could withstand a two story structure. <br />Vote: Ayes (6), Nays (0). <br />ROTH (CONT) <br />o <br />Post orrire Box G6 • C <br />Guenther <br />46 03 Ell. <br />Minneton! <br />NOTICE OF <br />Date of b <br />Votes: <br />Planning <br />NOTES ANI <br />applicatj <br />•1 n reviev <br />council:. <br />from lake <br />placemeni <br />required <br />aaraqe oi <br />App: <br />In all a <br />requester <br />or the C. <br />If the a <br />contact <br />If you <br />they ar <br />and app
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.