Laserfiche WebLink
>■ • ■. > ' <br />/- <br />_ _ _.--?>-i^»»?' <br />B/^/Li:^ (S-. <br />MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 19, 1982 Page 9 <br />/ <br />Mr. Roth was not present. Mr. George Stodola, Mr. Roth's J/^!UENTHER ROTH <br />plant manager, was present for him. 1428 Baldur~ParJr- <br />Variance <br />Kelley asked how much hardcover would be increased? #695 <br />McDonald asked if Baldur Park was a private road or a <br />City road? <br />Mabusth stated that it was a City road up until Mr. Boar's <br />property. <br />McDonald stated that these parcels of land weren't legally <br />combined for tax parcels with a street dividing them. <br />Also she noted that you can't put a garage on a property <br />unless a principal structure is on the property also. <br />Mabusth referred to the plat map and combination forms <br />dated 1979 that reflect the combination for tax purposes. <br />Rovegno stated that the size of the structure seemed more <br />like a house than a garage. He noted the building size <br />of 25' X 52' which is much too large. <br />Mr. Stodola stated that the applicant does a lot of wood <br />work, has a few boats and noted that this is the applicant's <br />summer cottage. <br />McDonald insisted that the lots were not combined and stated <br />that the lot combination form came from the finance division <br />at Hennepin County for tax purposes but that doesn't mean <br />that the lots are legally combined. <br />Mabusth stated that these lots are combined for tax purposes <br />and was completed in 1979 well after Baldur Park Road <br />became a City road. <br />Goetten again noted the size of this proposed structure. <br />She* felt this was much too ’large for a garage. <br />Kelley felt that the second story was alright but noted <br />that there is a hardcover concern. He also noted that <br />there is a swamp behind the proposed structure. He <br />felt that the neighbors shouldn't have any problems with <br />the proposed garage because the structure is between the <br />trees. He noted the solar second story which is very <br />attractive. <br />Opheim stated that this proposed garage is in the 0-75' <br />setback and the real issue is the applicant wants a <br />variance, he has sufficient hardships but the structure <br />is much too large. <br />Opheim moved to table Guenther Roth's application with the <br />suggestion that the applicant considerably reduce the <br />proposed garage and therefore have substantially less <br />hardcover. <br />Kelley seconded. <br />|i •• <br />■i <br />I <br />^4 <br />'i: <br />mm <br />V; <br />0-^ <br />- < <br />MINUTES OF <br />McDonald no <br />decided whi< <br />proposed st: <br />Rovegno fel <br />a two stall <br />Kelley sugg' <br />existing ho <br />year round. <br />Opheim stat <br />and that th <br />would they : <br />"normal" si <br />with it. <br />Rovegno sta <br />would be ou <br />it be put o <br />setback lin <br />Opheim stat <br />with a norm <br />side as the <br />it would be <br />Rc«vegno not <br />shoreline m <br />Goetten sug <br />side of the <br />soil boring <br />handle such <br />Kelley felt <br />stall and t <br />Hammerel co <br />McDonald su <br />(lot 8) and <br />Rovegno sta <br />be fine as <br />the lake, <br />the hardcov <br />Opheim stat <br />the side wh <br />be two stal <br />whether the <br />Vote: Ayes