My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-17-1983 Planning Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
10-17-1983 Planning Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2023 3:27:46 PM
Creation date
12/7/2022 2:57:19 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
B. <br />fi <br />,-:V. • ; ■.“•• ../ V : -,•••=, <br />."VV kv <br />V. ••.• ■ •; <br />i <br />•••■ •.: ■■} <br />■ '■ "-\ ■■' ■> :• V <br />■•' :'»tapj <br />} \ <br />13. <br />3 COMMISSION MEETING HELD OCTOBER 17, 1983 PAGE 3 <br />do not apply generally to other <br />land L located? «hlch said <br />Jhf granting of the application is necessary for <br />preservation and enjoyment of a substantial <br />property right of the applicant. <br />The granting of the proposed variance will not in <br />comfort, moraJs, o? <br />the 2L°ing'cole?°" ''® intent of <br />serve?®?*"*"^"^ ?* ®“°'’ ''atlance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is <br />Stfncui^y? demonstrable hardship or <br />Rovegno seconded. Vote: Ayes (4), Nays (2). <br />Opinions - Callahan and McDonald - Callahan <br />noted that the Planning Commission is looking at the <br />common ownership issue backwards and the City has an <br />Callahan%f«f Commission should follow. <br />^ u common ownership issue mustbe solved before granting a variance. <br />McDonald agreed with Callahan and she noted that there <br />IS some neighbor opposition and that the common <br />ownership issue should be solved first. <br />14. <br />’:1 <br />w&bm <br />'-riy. yv <br />; •.: •* • <br />. . . ■■;; ■ ■ : •■•• ■■. .,• . ' <br />j V'’- ■; • ■ <br />li • ^ <br />• .••• •■' •' • \ • ■■'•' <br />Mr. and Mrs. Overboe were present. Mabusth noted that <br />the applicant is asking for a variance to place a <br />detached garage in their limited front yard? <br />? granting this variance would be an <br />obstacle in the future if they plan on constructing a house on the other lot. i-iuccmg a <br />Adams moved to approve Ole Overboes request for a <br />aIvi??oh? garage to be placed 2' from thegiven right of way, 15' from the side and 38' from the <br />ravelled road based on the following findings: <br />1. Location of house on lot. <br />®>‘‘®*^i'’g - zoning district Standards asks for 140’ of width. <br />There is no additional land available. <br />The house has existed for 15+ years. <br />2. <br />3. <br />4.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.