10-17-1983 Planning Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

•>-v of 1 •-■I f MIHOTBS of the PLAHMIHG commission meeting held OCTOBER 17. 1983 PAGE 2 4"i ”0“G“s smith Goetten stated that if this lot was single separate ownership that the variance request would be ^ negative effect on theexisting neighborhood. buildable if the commonownership issue was solved* Sime stated that when the owner purchased the lot the common ow^nership wasn* t a problem and the owner wasn't aoie to foresee the common ownership in the future. ;• *1 a; ' V - •r*< 'n I Mabusth stated that Smith purchased the lot from effect^^th^ti^e^^ ownership was in Rovegno noted that if the common ownership hadn't been f application probably wouldn't haveany trouble receiving variance approval. Adams moved to approve a variance request made bv Douglas Smith based on the 100% standards with a lot area variance of 5,032 sf or 23% lot area and lot width 45% based on the following findings: 1. No available land - lots are developed on both S1Q0S * 2. Sewer and water are available. 3. House and improvements to be constructed without need for additional variances. 4. Applicant purchased property not knowing that the ordinance limitations on development of Lot 18. 5. Variance being granted despite the common ownership issue. </ 6.By granting this variance there will be no negative effect on the public health, safety and X n d IT 0 • 7. By granting this variance it is consistent with the development of the area. 8. By granting this variance there should be no need for future hardcover and setback variances. Planning Commission would like to note that the garage is a non conforming structure and subject to all pertinent ordinances. The special conditions applying to the structure of land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. 9. 10.