My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-19-1984 Planning Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
11-19-1984 Planning Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2023 2:56:48 PM
Creation date
12/7/2022 1:26:14 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 19, 1984 PAGE 5 <br />1874 DUANE BARTH i MRS. JOHNSTONE <br />1810 SHADYNOOD ROAD <br />VARIANCE - SECOND REVIEW <br />Duane Barth was present. Assistant Zoning <br />Administrator Gaffron noted the certificate of <br />mailing and the affidavit of publication. The <br />following neighbors were present: <br />I -I <br />Charles Pyle of 1820 Shadywood Road <br />Dave and Holly Eiss of 1790 Shadywood Road <br />Gaffron stated that this application had been <br />tabled at the October meeting pending submittal of <br />a number of items, one of them being the applicants <br />hardcover development proposal which is explained <br />on Exhibit E. <br />Barth explained for Lot 21 the applicant proposes a <br />75-250' hardcover of 22.7% using a porous paving <br />block driveway "grass pavers" which would eliminate <br />some of the hardcover problem. They are 80% open <br />on the top - we used 50% open in our calculation. <br />They are also set in sand 6 - 8" so all the water <br />goes through them. Sidewalks and decks are not <br />shown on the proposal. The existing garage would <br />be removed. <br />Barth further noted for Lot 22, with the existing <br />house, a proposed addition and a porous pavement <br />driveway (to be consistent), without decks or <br />sidwalks, the hardcover is 16.4%. <br />Gaffron's comments included a necessity to regulate <br />in the future the possible pavement of driveway on <br />Lot 21 and since we don't require a permit for <br />paving a driveway, how do we regulate it? <br />Gaffron went on to comment on the assessment <br />record. The vaccint lot has not been taxed at a <br />lower value, than the lot with the house, hence it <br />does not appear to have been considered as <br />accessory property to the lot with the house. In <br />fact, the land valuations have been almost equal <br />through-out the research period. <br />Gaffron explained Exhibit F, Plat Map of neighbor <br />hood existing development. It is from Coffee <br />Bridge to the intersection of 51 on the east side <br />of Hwy 19. Lot sizes are quite variable from .22 <br />to 1 acre with house. Lot 21 is 0.35 acres. Of the <br />25 properties in the strip, 11 or 44% are equiva <br />lent or smaller than either Lot 21 or 22.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.