Laserfiche WebLink
~n—T <br />I! • <br />I <br />Planninq Commission raised the issue of the creation of a sub ­ <br />standard building site with the transfer of B and rearrangement of C <br />and the neo^J for a future variance review. The same issue could have <br />been raised with the Smiley lot line rearrangement if Yale Smiley had <br />not applied for a building permit within a year of his variance <br />approval . <br />If Planning Commission agrees that the buildability of the un ­ <br />developed lot is not endangered and that the additional septic expan ­ <br />sion area provided for the developed lot is another positive finding <br />that the division be approved because the overall density is not <br />increased. Planning Commission may feel it necessary to also grant a <br />permanent area variance for the undeveloped lot. If the same positive <br />finding can be made in similar lot line rearrar.gnents involving sub ­ <br />standard lots but no increase in density, tlie City should consider <br />granting automatic area or width permit variances for the undeveloped <br />lot(s ) . <br />Staff Recommendation; <br />To approve the separation of P.l.D. 1 1-117-23 32 0004 from the <br />two contiguous rural parcels owned by Eleanor Lawler Pillsbury, the <br />division or rearrangement of P.l.D. 11-117-23 32 0005 and a permanent <br />area variance for undeveloped Pillsbury property based on one or more <br />of the following findings; <br />1. The division will not increase the overall density. <br />2. The applicant's current property contains .92 acres of area - <br />the 75 feet setback area and the house and improvements limit <br />future septic expansion on the existing property. <br />3. There is suitable and adequate area for principal and alter­ <br />nate septic systems on the undeveloped building site. <br />4. There is adequate area for a house to bo located within the <br />building envelope of the undeveloped property. <br />5. A permanent residence had existed on P.l.D. 1 1-1 17-23 32 0005 <br />up to 1979. <br />6. There is no additional undeveloped, contiguous land <br />available. <br />Approval is suljject to the following conditions: <br />1. P.l.D. 11-117-23 32 0004 and northern portion of rearranged <br />P.l.D. 11-117-23 32 0005 to be combined with Crosby homestead <br />lot. <br />2. P.l.D. 11-117-23 32 0006 and southern portion of rearranged <br />P.l.D. 11-117-23 32 0005 to be legally combined for tax purposes. <br />3. All future construction on undevelojed lot that involves the <br />alteration of flood plain fringe areas must be reviewed and <br />approved by the DNR before a building permit can be issued by the <br />City of Orono. <br />4. Tested septic site area on undeveloped lot must be staked and <br />protected prior to construction. <br />.1^ <br />I <br />i