04-15-1985 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

To; From Date: Plannincj Commission Members Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator April 10, 1985 Subject: #895 Thomas Crosby Sr., 1240-1260 Brackett's Point Road Subdivision - Class I Zoning District - LR-IA Application - Subdivision; Class I - motes and bounds division of a lot line rearrangement Second Review by Planning Commission - Tabled at the 3/19/85 meetiitg Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.03, Subdivision 6 (C) Section 11.03, Definition Subdivision (65) List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D1 , Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Exhibit G - Application & Transmittal Letter Property Owners List and Plat Map Plat Map - Pattern of Ownership D2, D3 - Plat Haps VUth Propr.sed Realignment Pillsbury Lot - Sketch Flan - Staff Sketch Drainfield Site Locations, Pillsbury Lot Preliminary Survey The applicant seeks not only a realigment or division of Parcel C (see Exhibit C) but approval for the transfer or separation of Parcel B, refer to the sane exhibit, from the commonly owned parcels of Mrs. Eleanor Lawler Pillsbury, Parcels B, C & D that total approximately 2.01 acres in area. Per Section 10.03, Subdivision 6 (C), Council approval is required when that separation results in a buildable site that does not satisfy current zoning standards. The new dividing lot line has been staked for your inspection. I have once again discussed the issue of the flood plain involvment at the proposed building location with John Pillsbury. Be wants mo to reassure the Planning Commission that the proposed division will not affect his choice of building location. Mr. & Mrs. Pillsbury met with me earlier this year and we discussed the buildability of the 2 acre site and the possibility of dividing off a portion of the property to be combined with his brother-in-law's substandard lot. I advised the Pillsbury's to select the site for the proposed building and to have the necessary septic tests made to assure a primary and alternate site. I reviewed the flood plain maps with them and advised that the survey should also designate the flood plain area. We met once again to review the survey. The building location was noted and I have sketched in the approximate location of the proposed residence on a survey (see Exliibit E). The preferred house location is indeed in volved with the outer or fringe portions of the flood plain - the future owners were made aware of that earlier this year. They have been advised that the DNH must review all alterations of a designated flood plain and that the City will require that the elevation of the first "Living Level" be 1 foot above the flood plain elevation of 931.5.