Laserfiche WebLink
As can be seen from the site plan submitted with this letter <br />we can meet all setback requirements for any propesed con­ <br />struction as well as maximum allowed ground coverage as re­ <br />quired in your new subdivision ordinance. The only item in <br />question is allowing the building to proceed on lots which <br />are below the size required for new subdivisions. Since these <br />lots are larger than any of the 60 foot lots north of them on <br />which homes were built or remodeled and since the lots have <br />been platted prior to the adoption of your newest zoning and <br />subdivision ordinance we feel that it would be a definite» <br />discriminatory hardship on the Johnstone's to deny the building <br />permits on either lot. <br />The Johnstone's purchased these two separate building lots at <br />different times and have purposely maintained the separation <br />of properties from a tax standpoint as well as assessments. <br />They have paid non homestead real estate taxes for the past <br />40 years on lot 21 and have paid a full assessment for sewer <br />and water mains on both lots. The plant service charge for <br />lot 21 will be paid at the time of issuance of the building <br />permit which is normal proceedure. <br />Based on the previously stated facts we respectfully request <br />your approval of this application for building permit on lot <br />21 and the subsequent permit for remodeling of lot 22. <br />Thank you for your consideratirtDn. <br />^T^^n^"^ari^, ^^elsior Design and Developement Inc,