Laserfiche WebLink
be economically unfeasable for me to meet the Johnstone's <br />asking price for the two lots. It is my intent, if the sale <br />is closed, to build a new, quality home on lot 21 and to re­ <br />model the existing home on lot 22. Both of these homes will <br />feature quality construction and will be designed with ex- <br />eriors which will be a credit to the neighborhood. I have <br />remodeled and constructed many homes in the Lake Minnetonka <br />area which have been attractive improvements to the neighbor- <br />hoous. This can be attested to by many of my previous customers <br />and neighbors of these home owners. This project will also be <br />an attractive addition to the neighborhood. <br />% <br />1 <br />The construction which we propose will meet all of the set­ <br />back requirements of your new ordinance and will also meet <br />the ground cover requirement in the 75 to 250 foot zone which <br />was previously questioned at your last meeting. These two <br />lots are the largest of the seven 60 foot lots in the immed­ <br />iate area. A summary of our building proposal follows: <br />Lot 21 <br />Lot size <br />Lot size 75' to 250' zone <br />Proposed building size <br />Proposed decorative porous <br />paving block driveway 428 sf X 557o <br />Total ground coverage <br />25% maximum allowed in ordinance = 2280 sf <br />Lot 22 <br />Lot size <br />Lot size 75' to 250' zone <br />House addition <br />Existing house in 75' to 250' zone <br />Proposed decorative porous <br />paving block driveway 635 sf X 55% <br />Total ground coverage 75' to 250* zone <br />257o maximum allowed in ordinance “ 2775 sf <br />15,000 sf <br />9,120 sf <br />839 sf <br />235 .4 sf <br />2,074 sf <br />17,000 sf <br />11.100 sf <br />940 sf <br />534 sf <br />349 sf <br />1,825 sf <br />2,775 sf <br />22.7% <br />16.4%