My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-18-1985 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1985
>
11-18-1985 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2022 2:24:12 PM
Creation date
12/1/2022 2:09:50 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
177
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD OCTOBER 17, 1983 PAGE 3 <br />#761 DOUGLAS SMITH 11* The conditions do not apply generally to other <br />landor structures in the district and which said <br />land is located. <br />12.the granting of the application is necessary for <br />the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial <br />property right of the applicant. <br />13.The granting of the proposed variance will not in <br />anyway impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or <br />in any other respect be contrary to the intent of <br />the Zoning Code. <br />14.That the granting of such variance will not merely <br />serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is <br />necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or <br />difficulty. <br />Rovegno seconded. Vote: Ayes (4), Nays (2). <br />Minority Opinions - Callahan and McDonald - Callahan <br />noted that the Planning Commission is looking at the <br />common ownership issue backwards and the City has an <br />ordinance in effect that the Commission should follow. <br />Callahan stated that the common ownership issue must <br />be solved before granting a variance. <br />McDonald agreed with Callahan and she noted that there <br />is some neighbor opposition and that the common <br />ownership issue should be solved first. <br />#782 OLE OVERBOE <br />4460 FOREST LAKE LANDING <br />VARIANCE Mr . and Mrs. Overboe were present. Mabusth noted that <br />the applicant is asking for a variance to place a <br />detached garage in their limited front yard. <br />Callahan asked if granting this variance would be an <br />obstacle in the future if they plan on constructing a <br />house on the other lot, <br />Adams moved to approve Ole Overboes request for a <br />variance for a detached garage to be placed 2* from the <br />given right of way, 15' from the side and 38' from the <br />travelled road based on the following findings: <br />1. Location of house on lot. <br />2. Substandard width 55' existing - zoning district <br />standards asks for 140' of width. <br />3. There is no additional land available. <br />4. The house has existed for 15+ years. <br />i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.