My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-18-1985 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1985 Planning Packets
>
11-18-1985 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2022 2:24:12 PM
Creation date
12/1/2022 2:09:50 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
177
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OP TDE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD OCTOBER 21, 1985. PAGE 10 <br />1978 McENENY continued <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that a clause in the <br />resolution approving Kel]y Cove stated "Outlot A may never be <br />used for future residential construction, but shall remain <br />as an open space area as density credit for existing duplex <br />unx^s••• • <br />McDonald stated that she felt by granting this variance they <br />would be setting a precedent for "open space". <br />There were no persons present objecting and the public <br />hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Chairman Callahan, seconded by Kelley, to <br />deny the variance application. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 2. <br />Rovegno and Sime voted nay. <br />Rovegno voted nay stating he felt it was a reasonable request <br />and that it would be more appropriate to park the cars indoors <br />rather than in view outside. <br />Sime voted nay stating that denying solely because of the <br />previous "open space" clause was not taking a realistic view <br />point. <br />WALTER H. PEMBERTON <br />NORTH SHORE DRIVE <br />VARIANCE <br />PUBLIC HEARING 10:26 - 10:5^ <br />The Certificate of mailing and affidavit of publication was <br />noted. <br />The purpose of the public hearing was to consider a request to <br />remove an existing cabin and replace with a new home and <br />detached garage. The following 7 variances are required for <br />the proposed site plan: lot area, lot width, hardcover, <br />average setback, conditional use permit for filling, <br />lakeshore setback, and 5ront setback. <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron reviewed the <br />proposed site plan. <br />Goetten questioned why the driveway and garage needed to be <br />located in the back of the house rather than the road side. <br />Mr. & Mrs. Walter Pemberton were present for this matter. <br />Pemberton stated the reason for the driveway and garage <br />location was for aesthetic reasons and to conform with ti»e <br />neighboring two houses. <br />Chairman Callahan questioned the buildability of this <br />extremely difficult lot. <br />The Pemberton's builder was present and stated the proposed <br />plan could be done. <br />J
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.