My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-21-1985 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1985
>
10-21-1985 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2022 2:28:51 PM
Creation date
12/1/2022 2:04:48 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
289
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
k- <br />To: <br />Pr( <br />Date: <br />Planning Commission Members <br />Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator <br />October 15, 1985 <br />Subject: #986 George Rovegno, 2010 Shoreline Drive - Variance <br />Zoning District - LR-IA <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - <br />Exhibit B - <br />Exhibit C - <br />Exhibit D - <br />Exhibit E - <br />Exhibit F - <br />Planning Commission %l«^.ces 8/19/85 <br />Staff Sketch <br />Planning Commission Notice of Action 8/20/85 <br />Affidavit of Publication <br />Certification of Mailing <br />Property Owners' List <br />At your August 19, 1985 meeting, the Planning Commission voted to deny <br />applicant's appeals application seeking an interpretation of the fence <br />ordiance (Section 10.03 Subdivision 15 (C) - amended 1/28/85). Per <br />Planning Commission notification, the applicant was asked if he wished to <br />amend his application to a variance procedure. The City Attorney has <br />advised that an appeals hearing does not satisfy requirements for variance <br />review. Planning Commission must hold a separate public hearing for the <br />variance procedure. <br />Pertinent Sections of the Code <br />Section 10.22 - Regulations for one family lakeshore residential districts <br />Section 10.03, Subdivision 16 - Traffic visibility <br />Staff has advised that Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 & 15 - Non- <br />c.ncroachments on yard and open spaces does not apply to a required setback <br />area only yard areas. Section 10.22 forbids all structures within 75 feet <br />of the lakeshore. The applicant must request a variance to place a fence <br />of any height within 75 feet of the lake. The fence is located <br />approximately 35 feet from the lakeshore. <br />The applicant has advised of the many problems sustained by him and <br />members of his family in the public's use of the 25 feet wide winter lake <br />access. He also advises of problems with passenger vehicles as they travel <br />along Shoreline Drive and the need for a privacy fence along the roadway. <br />The applicant has asked the City to recommend a new location for the <br />fence and still maintain the privacy and use of his private property. This <br />is not an easy task given the variation in elevation between the access <br />approach and the public road, existing structures along roadway, need to <br />maintain required 30 feet site distance at access approach to public road. <br />The City has placed posts along the south side of the public access in <br />order to define the edge of applicant's private property. Applicant should <br />advise if this is acceptable.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.