Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
f .- i <br />^ jC. <br />• <br />To: <br />From: <br />Planning Commission Members <br />Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator <br />Date:October 11, 1985 <br />Subject: #980 Richard Keaveny, 3423 Shoreline Drive - <br />Preliminary Subdivision <br />Zoning District - B-1 <br />Total Area - approximately 72,516 s.f. or 1.66 acres <br />Application ~ Subdivision - plat - two lots - refile of application <br />#714 granted preliminary approval by Council 4/25/83 - <br />application expired 4/25/84 <br />A) Lot 1 <br />Required = 20,000 s.f. <br />Proposed *= 20,000.4 s.f. <br />Lot 2 <br />Required <br />Proposed <br />20,000 s.f. <br />52,516 s.f. ©r 1.2 acres <br />Variance for existing structure on Lot 1 <br />Required = 15' <br />Proposed = 5' <br />Variance =10' or 67% <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A <br />Exhibit B <br />Exhibit C <br />Exhibit D <br />Exhibit E <br />Exhibit F <br />Exhibit G <br />Application <br />Plat Map <br />Property Owners List <br />Sewer As-Built <br />Hennepin County Letter - March 24, <br />Survey Dated January 14, 1976 <br />Preliminary Plan <br />1983 <br />The application involves the division of Keaveny's 1.6 acre <br />commercial property subject to the standards of the B-1 Zoning <br />District. Each lot contains the required minimum 20,000 s.f. in area <br />and meets the lot width requirement of 100'. <br />The structure on Loc 1 is five feet from the proposed boundary <br />line - structural modifications will not be required as long as a <br />five-foot setback is maintained. As proposed. Council is asked to <br />approve a side yard setback variance of 10 feet (required 15'). There <br />is adequate area and width to meet the setback standard. The future <br />use of Lot 2 is defined in aiu^ther application #982 to be reviewed at <br />this meeting. The existing building on Lot 2 shall remain as the <br />principal structure. Both applicant of #982 and owner of property <br />request the side setback variance to provide adequate width for <br />parking and traffic lane for future carry out restaurant. In the <br />original subdivision application, the owner sought a setback variance <br />and planned to obtain an easement from future owner to allow continued <br />use of loading area serving existing stores within shopping center. <br />The lot line can be gerrymandered to satisfy both area and setback <br />standards but staff sees no problem with plan as proposed. <br />.J