My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-16-1985 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1985
>
09-16-1985 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2022 2:16:50 PM
Creation date
12/1/2022 2:02:19 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
213
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
n <br />To:Planning Commission <br />Prom:Jeanne A. Maousth, Zoning Administrator <br />Date: <br />Subject: <br />September 11, 1985 <br />#928 Richard W. Pula, 2015 Webber Hills Road <br />Conditional Use Permit - Second Review <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - Gaffron Report <br />Exhibit B - Site Plan <br />Exhibit C - Planning Commission Minutes of 6/17/85 <br />Exhibit D - Floor Plan <br />At your June meeting, the Pula application was tabled pending receipt <br />of requirec septic testing and system design information. I have enclosed <br />Gaffron's report confirming for you that septic capacty is not a problem <br />for the Pula property (Exhibit A & B). <br />•t <br />At that same June meeting. Planning Commission discussed the need to <br />amend Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 (G) in order to address the special <br />needs of guest apartments. <br />If the code is to be amended in order to establish separate standards <br />for guest apartments consider the following issues: <br />1. Area standards must be addressed whether properties are sewered or <br />not sewered - If properties are required to meet 100% of the standards <br />for a single lot, how would this help the applicant? His lot contains <br />.9 acres in a 2 acre minimum zone. <br />2. Time limitations should be considered with each individual appli <br />cation. Council has asked each applicant to provide proof that guest <br />apartment is still used by relative(s) - In one application an appli <br />cant was asked to annually confirm in writing the guest apartment is <br />used by original occrpcrt. In another application, the owner stated <br />he wished the apartment use for 4 years for his son and son's spouse. <br />3. A change in occupancy requires notice to the City. Should guest <br />apartments he limited to use of relatives? <br />4. Whac limits or physical structures - access through main <br />house, size of area of apartment, others considerations dealing with <br />structural design? <br />5. Off-street parking for apartment <br />Planning Commission must make a recommendation for the Pula <br />application in consideration of the existing ordinance. If you vote to <br />recomend approval you must also approve an area variance of 3.1 acres. <br />(Even if the code is amended, the applicant would require an area variance <br />of 1.1 acres.) Approval should he conditioned on the following:
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.