08-19-1985 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mr. Bruce C. Douglas Page 2 E.Boating activities remain a nuisance. We heartily agree with your recommendation for the installation of water-borne buoys 200* cut into Maxwell Bay. This would certainly keep boaters from turning around Immediately in front of our dock and may force them to back out into the open water as we have suggested many times and that Mr. Dunn once agreed to. We are not interested in a "no cost slip" or having Chaska construct a U-shaped dock in front of our property for mutual use. Continuously running engines (like the Cobalt demo which was revved up for most of Sunday, August 11) is a real aggravation. How can a salesman deliver his pitch over all that noise? F.Wes* side dock configuration of main Chaska property. We are not interested in an agreement to change the dock configuration approved by the LMCD and the City of Orono. We will not agree to adjusting side site setbacks; even 20' is inadequate, especially when It Is not observed.J II. 3340 Worth Shore Drive (the Olson property) A.We appreciate the effort to date to clean up this property. Further comments will be made at the public hearing regarding Chaska's land use plan or variance request. B.Dockage - '340. It is our understanding that there is one (and only one) rental slip on the Maxwell Bay side. The boats parked there the last two weeks belong to Chaska, however. Where, oh where, is the renter? E.Fencing on the east lot line needs Improvement. The shoddy fence at the cottonwood tree was hastily con structed earlier this year by Chaska employees. This area needs attention, preferably using permanent, less tacky materials. F.Mixed Residential/Commercial Use: Again, comments will be made at the August 19 meeting depending on variances requested or land use plan presented. G.Cooperation. Your use of the phrases "minimize operational impact" and "obligation to maximize cooperation so as to eliminate the inherent conflicts" is inappropriate. > t