Laserfiche WebLink
i <br />; <br />',.-s®-: -.'rj;* ::mt£:xvpwcsjrmsacrrs~,zsvyszs^ :i:'jczr:.i <br />" “TPgy-i^ar^-tg: r’-rragrr.I- rtaiaps'L-c.saMaesssfmBrx'srri^yrsssrmrjn^^ -g:^TL‘;:rgtgrTr2 <br />/WESTWOOD PLANNING & ENGINEERING COMPANY <br />July 3, 1985 <br />Ms. Jean Mabusth <br />City of Orono <br />P.O. Box 66 <br />Crystal Bay, MN 55323 <br />RE: Gregory Residence <br />1410 Shoreline Drive; Wayzata, MN <br />City File: 927 <br />Dear Ms. Mabusth: <br />On behalf of the applicant, Mr. & Mrs. William Gregory, we are submitting <br />the following request for consideration by the City Planning Commission and <br />Council. For reasons that will be fully explained later In this letter, <br />three (3) variances are proposed to accommodate construction of a 21* x 32* <br />pool adjacent to a future greenhouse and tie existing house. These <br />variance requests are: <br />1. Lakeshore Setback <br />The proposed pool Is setback 53 to 59 feet from the lakeshore. This <br />average 56 foot setback represents a variance of 19 feet from the <br />required 75 foot setback* <br />2. Lakes!'»re Hardcover <br />A total of 100 square feet (85 square feet pool coping; 15 square <br />feet hard surface deck) of hardcover is proposed within the 0-75 <br />foot setback. This represents a 0.155Z Increase (see attached <br />calculations) over the allowed coverage of O.OZ. <br />3. Accessory Structure Setback <br />The pool, an accessory structure, la proposed to setback 5*-4" from <br />the future greenhouse and principal structure. This Is a 4*-8“ <br />variance from the required 10 foot setback. This variance Is <br />required only for a 16 foot wide area where the pool Is adjacent to <br />the greenhouse. <br />The site topography has offered severe limitations to the overall site <br />planning process. The steep slopes, soils, ground form and vegetation In <br />addition to zoning code setbacks, have contributed to restrictions on <br />locating the buildings, entry eourt, driveway, pool and septic system. The <br />present building locations on the top of the slopes was found to provide the <br />best site utilization by minimizing potential negative site Impact. The <br />proposed pool re-locatlon Is a result of these restrictions. Various site <br />locations have been explored. <br />741$ WAYZATA SOUirVAAO. MINNCAAOLIS. MifiNESOTA $S43$ |$ia S4A0US