My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-15-1985 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1985
>
07-15-1985 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2022 2:08:35 PM
Creation date
12/1/2022 1:47:44 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
181
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #927 <br />July 9, 1985 <br />Page 3 <br />The remainder of the unshaded grid area within the 0-250' setback area <br />is proposed as a non-hardcover improvement with the use of grass areas <br />and boardwalk (see page 3 of engineer's exhibit). The City engineer <br />will review the feasiblity and validity of this approach to the hard <br />cover issue (staff will report back to you at our meeting). Note, <br />this type of construction will be employed out of the 75' setback area <br />to compensate for excess of hardcover within 75 setback area and the <br />hardcover outside of the 75' setback area south of the principal <br />structure. <br />Consideration of Accessory Structure Setback Within Revised_Pl^Q, <br />The applicant's engineer notes the separation setback is required <br />for only a 16 foot wide area between pool and greenhouse. <br />The following findings have been suggested in support of the <br />variance setback of 4'8": <br />1. To move the pool as far out of the 75 foot lakeshore setback <br />as possible and out of the 50 foot DNR setback. <br />2. To maintain a 10 foot or more setback adjacent to the <br />house/greenhouse for as much distance as possible. <br />3* The desire to have a pool of 21 feet in width which helps the <br />sl^;*. ty concern of people, especially children, diving from the <br />shoitide of the pool. <br />4. Emei'^ency access to principal structure can be accomplished <br />to the east, south, west and within 13 foot setback on north. <br />5. The pool can also act as water reservior for fire protection. <br />As requested at your last meeting, the applicant has provided <br />sufficient argument to support the variance application. Planning <br />Commission members must decide are these valid in consideration of the <br />facts provided by both staff and applicant s engineer. <br />If you approve the multiple variance application use the hard <br />ships and findings noted above - remember you are now asked to approve <br />a separation setback from greenhouse to pool. Condition approval on <br />limiting hardcover to 127 s.f. within 0-75' setback area " <br />variances - applicant must develop property per standards of the code. <br />If you approve onl^ the hardcover setbek variance for the pool, <br />use apropriate findings above but condition approval on pool being <br />placed 10 feet from principal structure moving it as far out of the <br />lakeshore protected area as possible.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.